to each their own...
but what you’re supporting is what Disney has been doing with wilderness lodge deux and riviera: upscale chain.
What I'm supporting? It's not a political position. I'm "supporting" what I like. I prefer upscale over shtick.
Though I don't find Riviera to be "upscale chain" at all. I do find it to be a moderately upscale Disney-ish hotel.
its ok...the Loews universal hotels are much the same...they are nice. But not the same feel.
Royal pacific reminded me of riviera: not very pacific but very Marriott. Can’t compare to DAKL. Or wilderness...where the lobby is still amazing after 28 years...
From what I've seen, I love the lobbies at WL and AKV, but the beauty of the lobby is pretty low on my list of priorities.
Location crosses both WL and AKV off my list.
AKV: studio sizes 365 sf. CCV: studios only 338 sf.
Riviera: studio -- 423 sf.
So room size trumps the lobby.. Spend a lot more time in the room than in the lobby.
Location: AKV, buses every where. CCV - buses to most locations, boat to MK.
Riviera: Skyliner to 2 parks and to Boardwalk area. I'll take the Riviera.
Dining: Animal Kingdom wins, Riviera second. But I dislike all the dining at Wilderness Lodge. I liked the old Artist's Point, before it became a character meal.
And throw in my wife's perspective -- She hates dark wood decor, theming, etc. So she vetoes Animal Kingdom and Wilderness Lodge. (She also would have vetoed Poly for that reason).
Honestly, Riviera has so many strengths, so many advantages over most if not all other resorts, and it has a lot of huge fans..
But then there is this segment that seems to have an irrational hate for it, triggered by the semi-generic architecture and re-sale restrictions. To me, the theming of BLT is far far worse, but it doesn't seem to trigger the same type of hatred.
and the courtyard...then you run into a hard stop in the north/east wing. “Best of both worlds” to an accountant in Anaheim.
again...times change. I wouldn’t have bought Saratoga...but beach club was out and it was a year before DAK and Bay Lake were announced.
If those were the options -- SSR, BCV, DAK and BLT... I just wouldn't have purchased DVC. SSR has zero appeal to me.
BCV is a great location, but I'd only stay there with kids of a certain age (7-12ish) for the pool. The other problem is they stuck the DVC is the least desirable part of the property -- You really don't have any rooms with great views.
DAK -- I wouldn't mind staying there on occasion but the location knocks it off my list for ownership. (and my wife would veto it for the dark wood).
BLT -- location is the ONLY good thing about it. And even that -- there are some standard rooms at Riviera that have a better view than the BLT theme park view rooms. A premium theme park view that is primarily parking lot!?!?! Pools are awful. No dining really at BLT, everything is across the way at the Contemporary. Rooms are tiny and cheap feeling. I might stay at BLT for a short MK focused trip, but solely due to the location.