Has anyone ever heard of a case where the cops were called for refilling a drink?
Despite this article, I just can't imagine the police getting involved over an unauthorized drink refill, particularly if the individual can plead ignorance ("I thought refills were allowed"), unless there is repeated (after being asked to stop) or excessive abuse (filling a gallon jug or cup from home), or the individual is belligerent or something. I would expect the restaurant employees to handle the matter ("sorry sir, we don't offer free refills, so please don't do it again"). Which may well have occurred previously in this case, and if this guy had been told to stop taking free drinks several times but had just ignored the 'request', then I certainly could see it becoming a police matter. Law enforcement would also properly get involved in matters of aggression, which they claim this man was. Of course, very rarely you do get police officers on a power trip (people standing on a public sidewalk being threatened with arrest for taking pictures of trains, in one instance); Ordinarily they would try to diffuse the situation, such as letting the man pay for the drink.
While that is a benefit, The practice originated in the convenience stores where they didn't have extra positions behind the counter and they were focusing on quick in n out. Self serve kept the clerk free to move through patrons quicker. ( while being able to pitch people as being in control of their own coffee mix, etc)
'Commonly' does not mean you freely assume it and then put responsibility on the other party to prove otherwise.
Women may commonly accept your advances that doesn't mean you are free to take what you want from one unless there is a sign around her neck announcing 'no touching'
This line of justification always ends up with rediculous justifications like this guy who just posted 'it's legal until a judge says no'
Morals are becoming extinct
Morals are indeed on the endangered species list. If people had and used them, there would be no need for RapidFill or maybe even to post signs. And no, it most certainly is not legal until a judge says no (don't people take civics class anymore???). Maybe free refills are an activist interpretation of the 21st amendment to the Constitution.
That said, advances toward women is not the best analogy. Free refills are not universal but are quite *common* in fast-food restaurants where the beverage counters are in the dining room, whereas advances toward women are *never* permissible (perhaps beyond initial, innocent flirting) unless they give you reason to believe your advances are welcome.
I would agree with others that the default nowadays is that patron accessible machines imply free refills unless otherwise stated. And also most family restaurants give you free refills as well. If a place does not allow free refills, they will typically state it explicitly (often with a "refills $0.70" type of notation or the like)
It is common enough that people may well
assume refills are free even in the few places where they aren't. If there is no sign either prohibiting or permitting refills, it probably shouldn't be a surprise when people go ahead and fill up.
I don't believe the local buffet place (like Golden Corral) has any sign specifically stating you can make repeated trips to the buffet, but of course you can. I don't know if all of these such establishments really meant for people to make several trips to the prime rib station, but of course people do. With both drink refills and buffet lines, it might be nice if they told us either way what is included in the unlimited price, and what would mean an extra charge. Don't put people on the spot when they are made to guess, and some guess wrong.