flynnibus
Premium Member
Why are you talking about the 70s? It isn't the 70s anymore. It doesn't really apply then to the current discussion
Because if you follow the specific conversation - the posts in question were about when the machines were made self-serve in the first place and why... not why the machines are there now or why people think they are there now.
The original post
http://forums.wdwmagic.com/threads/...n-you-might-think.878940/page-42#post-6045656
There's a reason the machines were moved from behind the counter. I remember it plainly, it was quite the deal when McDonald's started allowing free refills, then the rest followed. Well, I was a lot younger, so it was a big deal to a small me, ha
And your original post regarding the subject definitely seemed to indicate that this now as you reveal "7os logic" still applies today
If you mean morals and ethics... yes. How sad is it we look to the 70s as a higher point in time then the present is..
As you admit, motivations and market trends have changed in 40 years. Flynn, I know you like to be right, an heck I even agree with you a decent amount of the time, but it's ok to not always know everything.
Now you're just mashing up words from different conversations. The basic morals have not changed - convenience stores have (the context of the 40yrs text) but that doesn't change basic social behavior. Do not take something that isn't yours... Respect others... if you go out on a limb and assume something, it's not someone else's burden to tell prove you shouldn't have (one should have the self-awareness they have gone beyond the known to the presumed).
The problem here is most people can not see beyond the 'whats the big deal.. refills are free...' to the morals and sociological issues actually at stake. The same corrupted morals justifying presumptions that you can do it because there is no sign or simply because its what you are most familiar with is part of the selfishness lack of self-responsibility so prevalent in our society today.
An illustration... if I chose to drive 5-10mph over the limit under the assumption they don't enforce the limits that strict.. then that is my CHOICE and something I must assume ownership of. If I get busted for doing 61 in a 55, then I need to accept the responsibility that I chose to drive that fast... not blame the cop for being a prick about the limit. This is blaming others for your choices.
In the soda context... if I chose to take additional refills from the soda fountain because I PRESUME they are free... then I must accept that choice is my own based on what info/risks/etc I had available. If I then get scolded for taking something that wasn't mine... I should ACCEPT THE RESPONSIBILITY that I incorrectly extended beyond what was offered to me. NOT turn around and blame the establishment for not putting up a sign telling me I couldn't do it. The latter is blaming the vendor for your assumption. That is the point I've been arguing. You can't blame others for choices you've made that extend beyond what is offered or answered.
You make assume refills because that's what you are familiar with - that does not mean your assumption redefines the rules or passes the burden to someone else if your assumption is wrong.