Figment632
New Member
No, it's not...
But if they were to use the characters from the animated film, that could potentially work....
Could??? It works fine in DL.
No, it's not...
But if they were to use the characters from the animated film, that could potentially work....
Could??? It works fine in DL.
No, it's not...
But if they were to use the characters from the animated film, that could potentially work....
Yeah, sure. But I don't think the popularity of the Tim Burton film has done much to raise demand for old-school Alice in Wonderland. If it has, it will have died out before any new Alice themed attraction could be built.
Not saying Alice would be bad. Just saying that the success of the Burton film doesn't really translate into the need for Alice attractions.
My point was that if there was a demand for AIW in FL, it could met with the hand-drawn movie and not the Burton version....
Whose rules are these???
I don't get this So what if they wanted to put an Alice dark ride in FL based off of the live action film. This wouldn't belong because it isn't hand drawn animation?
Fantasyland belongs to Walt and WDAS. Simple.
No Burton because it isn't WDAS produced. It's actually quite simple. I'm not getting the second-guessing.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.