Prices for the Polynesian DVC Bungalows

DVCOwner

A Long Time DVC Member
Availability wise, I suspect the studios will be faster to book up than the bungalows. Which brings me to wonder, since most buyers will be looking simply at reserving the studios wouldn't there be an imbalance of the number of members looking to reserve those rooms to the number of points sold for those units? This is going to cause problems with folk having to walk their reservations in order to get those rooms & Member services will be even busier unless they can put a stop to walking.

(Only way to do it: require the entire reservation to be released back into the system, run the wait list on it, then if available allow the new reservation dates. This more or less messes with the rest of us who don't walk, but need to change one day here or there.)

Do not think this will be a problem because Disney Vacation Club will balance the demand with the total number of points. They will just lower the points need for the 20 bungalows and spread the difference out over the 360 studios. Due to the ratio of bungalows to studios, they could decrease the bungalows about 19 points and increase the studios about 1 point per night (I know I am rounding off the math and the number is not exactly that). They would continue this until the demand for bungalows matches the demand for studios.
 

WDWFigment

Well-Known Member
I gotta love this thread. Seriously, 25 pages of inanity and it doesn't involve me (yet!) ... @wdwmagic must be thrilled!

To be honest, I've skimmed quite a few pages here ... that's what happens when you're watching Tom Brady and the Patriots show what winners do. You already knew the ending, sorta like this thread. But there's still the entertainment of how you'll get there.

I quoted the two fine gentlemen above simply because I thought both points were simple and accurate, if not especially eloquent.

Now, there absolutely is jealously by some (at least folks like @sshindel admitted that was his case). Some of us aren't jealous, though. We're sorta angry and amused at how blatantly money-grubbing Bob Iger's WDC has become and how so many people feel the need to either attack those who are bothered by this 'vision' for WDW or simply fall upon the absurd 'Disney is a business so they can do anything blah, blah, blah' line that they ignorantly feel is the answer to any critique of a company in 2015.

I have no doubt that these villas will be a huge success (I am the one who has already seen concept art of what they intend to do at the WL, so they **** well know they can do this and make lots of money by doing it.)

@Tom is right.

They will be sold and/or rented. They will become some of hardest WDW units to book. Count on it.

What I find amusing beyond belief is that many of you actually think these are for the rich. The top of the one percent bracket. People that see $2500 a night like you'd see $250 or maybe $150 a night. If you think that,well, that's where you folks are incredibly off, as misguided as can be.

I may only be a faux top one percenter (one thing this place and the Twitverse has taught me is that very few people apparently know the definition of faux), but I am related to one percenters (at the very high end) and I have worked and played and traveled with others.

Real one percenters, people who care about exclusivity and luxury? They ain't who these bugalows (yes, that was intentional because while killer amoeba is greatly exaggerated as an issue in those waters and always brings amusement to discussions of natural water at WDW, the fact they breed zillions of mosquitoes can't be shouted loud enough, are being built for or marketed to.

Most of those folks have zero interest in WDW. If they care or want to take their children, then they'll come and rent high end suites, either on property or off. Those presidential suites and VP suites. From the Grand Flo to the Poly to the Ritz Carlton and, mots assuredly, the new luxury Four Seasons. Some will wind up in Golden Oak too. That's where they'll go. Not the little shacks out on the swamp. And you guys/gals are right, money is of no concern to them. But value for that money and, much more importantly, service and standards are.

No, these villas are aimed at another audience entirely.

And that brings me to Jake's post.

The people who are being looked at for these new options are the Disney chronics, many who have some money (but are not loaded by any stretch), many who get that money from all of us be it government workers, military or folks on disabilities (real and imagined). They are aimed at folks who already own DVC, but might like more. They are aimed at Lifestylers.

There are people who will come and stay at the Grand Flo for a week while their bills go unpaid ... some of them have even put those comments on this very forum (in discussions I have steered clear of) ... Disney is such an addiction for them.

Jake used the word ''stupid'' to describe these people because it is inflammatory and likely to get reactions (as it has, as I am doing as well). Are they stupid?

Who knows? Everyone's circumstances are different. Generally, I don't find folks who buy/own timeshare to be making smart financial decisions. But for some people, it can work and be smart. I don't own DVC (I have relations who do) and I've never found Disney's sales pitches at all compelling evidence that I was missing out on something. Now, my significant other ('Angie M' for those kids playing at home in the Twitverse) bought resale DVC at the BW at quite a discount BEFORE she ever met me, and she doubled her points with a resale at WLV in the last year after we tossed it around. I recently spent a week at WDW on DVC points. ... But the idea of ever buying any at retail, from Disney, strikes me as a profoundly unwise and, yes, stupid decision.

And that's what we're here for (beyond paying for Steve's retirement by driving revenue to this site), to discuss what we think of various aspects of WDW, TWDC and themed entertainment.

Some of us are jealous. Some of us don't care at all. Some of us are amused. Some bemused. Some sickened. Some can't wait to write checks (some even credit checks!) to Ken Potrock and George Kalogridis and Co.

Like goes on no matter how we feel. But this site exists for us to express any of the above opinions and argue them and then some.

I am sure the ''Mommy Bloggers'' and the ''pixie dusters'' that Jake referenced will love them. They exist for that purpose.

I do wonder if Disney will be giving freebies any of their bloggingwhores for these. My guess is they'll all get tours before they open, so they can give DVC free advertising and publicity. I doubt that anyone in the O-Town circles will get a comped stay except for a whale like Lou Mongello. Beyond him, I'd be shocked if @WDWFigment doesn't stay there on his own DVC points quickly and Mrs. Brigante's meal-ticket has the money to stay there on cash. The rest of the O-Towners in the circle couldn't afford it if their lives depended upon it, although I could see three couples getting together and renting one for a few nights and then they tell all their flocks how amazing they are etc ...

Will I ever stay there? Doubtful. I don't see much value in them from the DVC standpoint and none whatsoever from the cash standpoint.

Maybe it's my roots showing, but I'd much rather experience the real thing in Bora Bora myself (even without MAGIC Bands, Disney buses, chicken fingers and ECVs!)

Now ... I'll go back to my Spirited thread and wish you all good luck in getting this to 50 pages by Monday!

I don't have the points for a stay there, as we only have a small contract purchased a while ago via resale. I won't argue with @ParentsOf4's number crunching, but I think the circumstances in which DVC is a good value--even via resale--are extremely limited if you're accounting for TVM (and from a financial perspective, you must). As resale prices inexplicably climb, this is becoming more and more true.

Disney could charge whatever they want for these. There's a scarcity of the units and a longage of people with enough disposable income (I'd argue this is probably a 50/50 mix of Disney fans and "real world" people who have enough money that they aren't concerned with value) that they will always be booked.

As for paying with cash...I'm too cheap. From time to time, I will pay high rates for hotel rooms, but the price has to be commensurate with the quality and service offered. Even though I like the look of these rooms, I do not view them as offering good value.
 
Last edited:

ParentsOf4

Well-Known Member
I don't have the points for a stay there, as we only have a small contract purchased a while ago via resale. I won't argue with @ParentsOf4's number crunching, but I think the circumstances in which DVC is a good value--even via resale--are extremely limited if you're accounting for TVM (and from a financial perspective, you must). As resale prices inexplicably climb, this is becoming more and more true.

Disney could charge whatever they want for these. There's a scarcity of the units and a longage of people with enough disposable income (I'd argue this is probably a 50/50 mix of Disney fans and "real world" people who have enough money that they aren't concerned with value) that they will always be booked.

As for paying with cash...I'm too cheap. From time to time, I will pay high rates for hotel rooms, but the price has to be commensurate with the quality and service offered. Even though I like the look of these rooms, I do not view them as offering good value.
Any DVC purchase, direct or resale, can make financial sense under the right set of circumstances. However, so long as Disney continues to increase prices of DVC purchases much faster than its Deluxe Resort hotel rates, those circumstances are shrinking.

If you:
  • Have to stay at the Polynesian and can't imagine staying anywhere else and
  • Visit WDW when Disney does not offer its common "Room Only" discounts and
  • Have money in the bank to pay cash
Then you should be able to reach that magical "break-even" point in about a decade. If you are very good at investing your money (instead of tying it up in a DVC membership), then the break-even is about 15 years.

Once you start deviating from this small group, your break-even point starts stretching out into decades.

Consider this:

Assuming you have your money in a good (not great) investment such as a typical 401K and assuming you can book when Disney offers its common 30% off Deluxe Resort discounts, 40 years of vacations at the Yacht & Beach Club will cost less than 40 years of ownership at the Polynesian Villas & Resorts.

Are you really sure that you like the Polynesian that much?
 
Last edited:

freediverdude

Well-Known Member
I disagree. The $266k range does vary by year and location. Just google it now, and you will see a range, but no where near $800K. People think that the top 10%, 5% and 1% are richer than they actually are.

Every time I've looked at the IRS numbers, the top 1% was usually listed around $250k and higher, and top .1% were the people in the millions. Remember top 1% just means 1 out every 100 people, more of them around than you would think. .1% is a much more exclusive bracket.
 

freediverdude

Well-Known Member
I don't have the points for a stay there, as we only have a small contract purchased a while ago via resale. I won't argue with @ParentsOf4's number crunching, but I think the circumstances in which DVC is a good value--even via resale--are extremely limited if you're accounting for TVM (and from a financial perspective, you must). As resale prices inexplicably climb, this is becoming more and more true.

Disney could charge whatever they want for these. There's a scarcity of the units and a longage of people with enough disposable income (I'd argue this is probably a 50/50 mix of Disney fans and "real world" people who have enough money that they aren't concerned with value) that they will always be booked.

As for paying with cash...I'm too cheap. From time to time, I will pay high rates for hotel rooms, but the price has to be commensurate with the quality and service offered. Even though I like the look of these rooms, I do not view them as offering good value.

I agree. The furnishings of the unit, the size of the unit, the services offered, including no daily housekeeping unless you pay extra, all don't seem to add up to the value you would expect from a $2000+ per night unit. If you took that money per night to Vegas, I would imagine you would end up with 24/7 butler service, concierge service that can get you almost anything your heart desires, not just "maybe we can get you a table at one of the Disney restaurants" and some snacks/drinks, and still be walking (even monorail in some cases, so apples to apples there too) distance to many attractions.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
Every time I've looked at the IRS numbers, the top 1% was usually listed around $250k and higher, and top .1% were the people in the millions. Remember top 1% just means 1 out every 100 people, more of them around than you would think. .1% is a much more exclusive bracket.

And people forget when people are talking about the 1%... they are not talking about the LITERAL top 1% - but has become a pseudonym for the people so rich they are detached from how the rest of the world lives.
 

NelsonRD

Well-Known Member
Every time I've looked at the IRS numbers, the top 1% was usually listed around $250k and higher, and top .1% were the people in the millions. Remember top 1% just means 1 out every 100 people, more of them around than you would think. .1% is a much more exclusive bracket.

There is no such thing as upper and lower 1%, if they were upper, they would be in the .5%. Second, there is less people than you think in the millions range. There is 317 Million people, and when I looked this up, only about 300,000 people in this country according to IRS that filed income greater than 1M a year.

Far less than people think. Also people in the 10%, 5%, and 1% ranges are less rich than people think. 1% is not private jets, as implied by the media.
 
Last edited:

majortom1981

Active Member
I agree. The furnishings of the unit, the size of the unit, the services offered, including no daily housekeeping unless you pay extra, all don't seem to add up to the value you would expect from a $2000+ per night unit. If you took that money per night to Vegas, I would imagine you would end up with 24/7 butler service, concierge service that can get you almost anything your heart desires, not just "maybe we can get you a table at one of the Disney restaurants" and some snacks/drinks, and still be walking (even monorail in some cases, so apples to apples there too) distance to many attractions.

Heck with akl you can spend 125 points for a week and get concierge. You don't get that with the bungalos.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom