It is just kind of a shame that they have a film about Mexican culture that was so beloved in Mexico that it became the highest grossing film ever there and an IP-based ride in the Mexico Pavilion that rarely attracts any wait, yet that's the WS overlay they don't do because they're concerned they won't move enough merchandise.Just my two cents, but Disney has much larger fish to fry in Epcot (I'm looking at you Imagination pavilion)
and FAR better ways to spend their money.
For once, I'm glad they're not able to slake their IP-shotgun blast bloodlust. (too graphic?)
Poppins > Coco
It is sad when you put it that way, and sadder still when you figure these types of decisions are really only them looking out for their bottom line and have no creative integrity behind them. However, I think this is a problem inherent with the whole IP-only mandate. High B.O. receipts won't always translate into high merch revenue and if DI$ isn't seeing both, then they'll balk.It is just kind of a shame that they have a film about Mexican culture that was so beloved in Mexico that it became the highest grossing film ever there and an IP-based ride in the Mexico Pavilion that rarely attracts any wait, yet that's the WS overlay they don't do because they're concerned they won't move enough merchandise.
Just my two cents, but Disney has much larger fish to fry in Epcot (I'm looking at you Imagination pavilion)
and FAR better ways to spend their money.
For once, I'm glad they're not able to slake their IP-shotgun blast bloodlust. (too graphic?)
It's very true they have other far better ways to spend their money, but in this case, this overlay made a lot of sense and I was personally looking forward to it. I get it from their perspective, the Three Cabs only moved in a decade-ish ago, so it shouldn't be a priority, but this overlay just makes so much sense it's surprising this is the one they're pushing off. JMO.
But I'm OK with it not happening now (but I wish it were), although this company could afford the overlay on top of everything else if they *really* wanted to but I know there are a lot of hoops to go through and it's not as easy as "give me the money".
Would that give the UK attraction a bigger budget?Right now I’m not sure. Although it does seem to be missing the boat more and more.
I heard the UK budget may have grown after previously being reduced. If it’s due to Mexico I don’t know.Would that give the UK attraction a bigger budget?
I really hope this is a dark ride.I heard the UK budget may have grown after previously being reduced. If it’s due to Mexico I don’t know.
I love Coco but I’m not upset it may not happen. Epcot (and WDW in general) needs to focus on building new attractions instead of just being uncreative and lazy by doing all these overlays. Entirely new attractions >>>>>> overlays
Maybe they're going to move the Day of the Dead check-in point from Agent P (a box with a marionette skeleton in the Mexican restaurant) to that?
When you think of it like that, sure, it's too bad.It is just kind of a shame that they have a film about Mexican culture that was so beloved in Mexico that it became the highest grossing film ever there and an IP-based ride in the Mexico Pavilion that rarely attracts any wait, yet that's the WS overlay they don't do because they're concerned they won't move enough merchandise.
I guess it depends a little on what Poppins is. If it's a more souped-up carousel with a nicer queue, for example, I'm not sure the trade-off would be worth it for me. If we get a good rather than mediocre dark ride, maybe it would be a reasonable trade-off.When you think of it like that, sure, it's too bad.
But would you rather NEW rides, or money spent retheming existing rides? Sure both would be great, but if not getting this means Poppins has a bigger budget, then i'm all for that.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.