That's great in concept, but having stayed in DVC rooms often, it's clear these are not always the best rooms in the resorts. Which is a shame. Sometimes when it's an add-on, like Bay Lake, they are newer than the rooms in the rest of the resort. But it does not make the rooms better necessarily. Some DVC rooms wear out faster than the cash rooms, I think it's because the occupancy rate is very high, like 95% and up. Old Key West, those studios are bigger than most standard rooms on property. However, many DVC studios are SMALLER than the regular "cash" rooms on property - Wilderness Lodge is a prime example. Of course you can upgrade to the 1BR/2BR, those are bigger, can be nicer. But unfortunately there's no hard and fast rule that guarantees being in a DVC room equals the best rooms on property. Each resort and set of rooms is different, they're all on different refurb schedules, and some DVC are long overdue for hard goods refurb!I would not call Top OfThe World a failure...almost every time I have been there it has been very busy... So busy they lock off the elevators to the lounge and you have to wait to be sent up.... TYhe more DVC units in a resort, the busier the lounge will be.
As long as it is not taking something away from the resort, I love the idea of a DVC special lounge in each DVC resort....let's face it, DVC if you add it up, is like staying in the most premium room at the hotel, so why not have a little perk... again, not taking away anything from the other guests, but adding something for the DVC members... Love that idea.
I actually think animal kingdom lodge is the most unique. What other resort can yo utalk to people who live in afrcan villages and sit by a fire while watching giraffes walk by ? People should give animal kingdom lodge a try. ITs got a similar feel to it as the poly does with the thatched roof and everything. even has a waterfall in the lobby.The Polynesian was the most unique of all of the Disney properties, partly due to it's lush, living tropical lobby. We would always visit because it made you feel as though you had truly arrived in the tropics of the South Pacific. It was a very calming influence in the middle of a very hectic vacation destination. It was always a dream to stay at the Polynesian, and we were fortunate enough to be able to do so twice. We were supposed to have stayed in concierge 2 years ago, but due to health problems in the family we cancelled our trip and went to visit them instead, figuring we could always have our dream concierge stay later on. Little did we know that TPTB were going to wave their "not so magical wands" and disrupt the most peaceful, laid back oasis that existed on
Disney property. RIP Disney's Polynesian Resort.
I personally think they really messed up the Polynesian.
The Polynesian is my favorite resort and, while I do not agree with some of the changes they are making, the integrity will still be there. There will still be fountains and waterfalls and lush foliage everywhere. The hotel needed a face lift. While the center fountain really brought character, charm, and a legendary smell to the hotel, it was something that needed to go for structural reasons. Someone posted on here recently talking about how the people who built the thing were surprised it even lasted this long! I love the hotel with all my heart, but I am certain the spirit will remain. And from the looks of it the majority of the hotel will be left intact.
Nobody can be sure of anything until the project is complete.While I guess I can appreciate your optimism, how are you so certain that the "integrity" and "spirit" will remain? (see the parts of your post I bolded).
We have seen countless times of cases where Disney's "new and improved" product is significantly poorer than the original -- in terms of theming, quality of materials used, and uniqueness of design -- and becomes a blander, more generic version of the what was previously there.
Sadly, from many accounts, it appears that is also what's happening at the Poly.
While I guess I can appreciate your optimism, how are you so certain that the "integrity" and "spirit" will remain? (see the parts of your post I bolded).
We have seen countless times of cases where Disney's "new and improved" product is significantly poorer than the original -- in terms of theming, quality of materials used, and uniqueness of design -- and becomes a blander, more generic version of the what was previously there.
Sadly, from many accounts, it appears that is also what's happening at the Poly.
Wait and See?Nobody can be sure of anything until the project is complete.
these walls must either be super temporary or disney is really cutting budgets using plastic tarps.
I can't speak for everyone, of course, but for me, the waterfall is more symbolic of the whole problem. I think if you read through the other posts on this thread you'll see that dissatisfaction with the lobby as shown in the concept art is as much the issue as anything. The waterfall was the central element of Poly's particular style. Removal of this one element would be a lot easier for me to like if the replacement was going to evoke the same kind of style. Instead, the concept art shows a rather muted style. As I said in another post, it looks like it was designed by someone who finds tiki in bad taste, but was required to include it. Of course, there's always a chance the lobby, when built, will look much better than the concept art, but the art is all we have right now.Here's a question for everybody concerned about the removal of the waterfall (which I understand and agree that removing it sucks): is your love for the entire hotel dependent on the water feature? Or is there more charm throughout the entire grounds, within the restaurants, pools, hallways, exterior, etc where you'll still enjoy this location?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.