MOXOMUMD
Well-Known Member
Thank you. Ventress is my favorite character to come out of the animated Clone Wars. I liked how they worked her storyline.Nice new avatar!
![Geek :geek: :geek:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/geek.png)
Thank you. Ventress is my favorite character to come out of the animated Clone Wars. I liked how they worked her storyline.Nice new avatar!
I mean they are better than the US Virgin Islands. I'll take Tortola over St. Thomas any day.By trump, you mean what?
They already are an equal financial burden. The Federal government recently spent tens of billions of dollars to build a subway (part elevated) metro system for San Juan. They are all entitled to the same benefits as everyone - food stamps, health care, social security, welfare, etc. If a hurricane ever hits, FEMA is still responsible. If we can get their economy going and they become a state, then, at least, they will at least contribute in the form of income taxes for all the services we give them that are now "free". That's why the anti-statehood movement there would rather not change things!I can't put PR in the same category as Detroit. Detroit is paying federal taxes part of a state. If we take PR on as a state it is for now a financial burden on all 50 states. Not ready to take on that responsibility. PR just took on the idea of statehood while tanking. Till then not so much. It was a PR move during election to entertain. Election over and back burner. And you still think Disney should jump into kettle and help PR?
I'm not that big of a day dreamer. Best case it be decades for PR to pull their financial weight as a state. Meanwhile we are still struggling as a nation so taking on PR would mean our states would get less to bail out PR and or higher taxes for the states with no upside for me or my family town county or state. People want to transfer burdens. I don't want it likely Disney doesn't.One more thing, then I promise to move on to other subjects. I just want to explain why I'm suddenly interested in what happens in PR. I've been chatting with someone on the net from there for about two years already. When we were first talking, she and her family were living there. She, like many other families there, made it a rule that only English were allowed to be spoken in their household. She showed me pictures of her town. To me, they looked very third world-ish. She said, despite the heat, public schools there were not air conditioned. Then, after like a few months after we started talking, her family abruptly decided to pack up and spontaneously leave PR permanently for the mainland USA, moving to PA, then later to NJ. When they got to PA, she bumped into old friends from the island who also got the same idea (to move). Everyone in her family had no problem finding jobs.
The thing that got me thinking is that Puerto Ricans, as American citizens, have the right to move anywhere in the USA - no questions asked. Supposedly, more Puerto Ricans live on the US mainland than do Puerto Rico. As the economy doesn't seem to be improving there, more and more make the exodus to the mainland. If the economy gets better, less people would find it necessary to do that.
Imagine if we tore down the barriers for Mexicans to get into the US and automatically granted them citizenship. That's basically what's going on right now with PR. That's one more reason why we need to help them and grant them statehood status.
So they are a burden OK I'll give you that. Government is supplying all that OK what good came from that? Do I want PR voting on funding for my kids schools or my medical care or my retirement pension? Not so much.They already are an equal financial burden. The Federal government recently spent tens of billions of dollars to build a subway (part elevated) metro system for San Juan. They are all entitled to the same benefits as everyone - food stamps, health care, social security, welfare, etc. If a hurricane ever hits, FEMA is still responsible. If we can get their economy going and they become a state, then, at least, they will at least contribute in the form of income taxes for all the services we give them that are now "free". That's why the anti-statehood movement there would rather not change things!
There are things that could be done short of bailing them out. Let me be clear, I'm not advocating a bail-out. Their constitution (which would stay the same unchanged if they become a state) says paying interest on their debt must be priority number one in every budget cycle. So, they are constitutionally obligated to take care of themselves. There are tweaks in the laws we can do too to help them. Right now, they're considered as a foreign port of trade and their import/exports are double-taxed. This turns off a lot of investments. I'm with you when you say it could take decades, but there are things that can be done to speed the process up short of a bail-out.I'm not that big of a day dreamer. Best case it be decades for PR to pull their financial weight as a state. Meanwhile we are still struggling as a nation so taking on PR would mean our states would get less to bail out PR and or higher taxes for the states with no upside for me or my family town county or state. People want to transfer burdens. I don't want it likely Disney doesn't.
I didn't know that (about AC). I don't want them to be a burden either. Living with the status quo guarantees that they remain a burden. Granting them statehood gives them a real chance to fix their economy on their own without a bailout. It also forces them to pay income taxes. A better economy paying income taxes, or the status quo with its stagnant economy getting all the benefits without paying taxes for it... Which is more of a burden?So they are a burden OK I'll give you that. Government is supplying all that OK what good came from that? Do I want PR voting on funding for my kids schools or my medical care or my retirement pension? Not so much.
Edit. Do you realize how many states in the USA do not have air conditioned school's PR isn't the only people who struggle without a/c
I didn't know that (about AC). I don't want them to be a burden either. Living with the status quo guarantees that they remain a burden. Granting them statehood gives them a real chance to fix their economy on their own without a bailout. It also forces them to pay income taxes. A better economy paying income taxes, or the status quo with its stagnant economy getting all the benefits without paying taxes for it... Which is more of a burden?
EDIT - Voting on pensions is a state thing, not a national thing, so nothing would change there. State issues will remain state issues and PR would not be involved in your state's issues.
I ended the conversation by liking Gabe1's last post. I thought it was a very intellectual conversation. No tempers were flared and I enjoyed it (unlike some of the monorail "discussions" from the past).This whole chain of posts just reeks of politics. Best to drop it now before it gets out of hand.
After I defrost.... If I was in PR right now, this wouldn't be a problem! LolOk enough about PR, I want to know more about this movie you're making.
Oh please you live in Florida! No sympathies from meAfter I defrost.... If I was in PR right now, this wouldn't be a problem! Lol
Brrrrrrrrr
You're used to it! So was I, but you get spoiled...Oh please you live in Florida! No sympathies from me![]()
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.