I don't know if it was necessary or not for Disney to buy the Harry Potter theme park rights, but I think many of you are kidding yourselves when it comes to Potter's popularity.
First of all, I think that Harry Potter really has a place with Lord of the Rings and the Chronicles of Narnia as far as book series go with long-time popularity. Like those, I don't see it being a flash in the pan, and I think the books will be enjoyed for generations to come.
The movie franchises is where things deviate at least a little. The Lord of the Rings has really established itself as a great film franchise and will be looked back on fondly, and should be watchable for years to come. I'm not as sure where Harry Potter or the Chronicles of Narnia will fall here. Harry Potter is definitely in much better shape, as Disney failed with Prince Caspian, but neither franchise completely lives up to the worlds that were created in the books.
With that being said, was Disney smart in turning down the offer? I really don't know. Basing an entire land around a single franchise may not be the best thing to do, but to have only one new attraction, that made need to be replaced in the next 15-20 years for something newer, could cause them some headaches. Hopefully the showing that Universal is getting will wake Disney up to getting some revolutionary attractions of there own and work on expanding or building new lands to better complete DHS and AK.
First of all, I think that Harry Potter really has a place with Lord of the Rings and the Chronicles of Narnia as far as book series go with long-time popularity. Like those, I don't see it being a flash in the pan, and I think the books will be enjoyed for generations to come.
The movie franchises is where things deviate at least a little. The Lord of the Rings has really established itself as a great film franchise and will be looked back on fondly, and should be watchable for years to come. I'm not as sure where Harry Potter or the Chronicles of Narnia will fall here. Harry Potter is definitely in much better shape, as Disney failed with Prince Caspian, but neither franchise completely lives up to the worlds that were created in the books.
With that being said, was Disney smart in turning down the offer? I really don't know. Basing an entire land around a single franchise may not be the best thing to do, but to have only one new attraction, that made need to be replaced in the next 15-20 years for something newer, could cause them some headaches. Hopefully the showing that Universal is getting will wake Disney up to getting some revolutionary attractions of there own and work on expanding or building new lands to better complete DHS and AK.