Disney could include the park hopper option to all there tickets at no charge. But they wont, its a way of adding options on to a product and charging more money for it. Car dealers do it, airlines do it, its just the American way
drawing a total blank here but...
For our september we've opted NOT to upgrade to park hoppers. This will be a first for us...
Anyways... even with the base ticket... am I allowed to go to the MK in the morning...leave for a quick swim or nap... and come back to the MK in the afternoon/evening? Or am I "forced" to stay in the park the entire time?
thanks... had a total brain fart and didn't know :wave:
No more hand stamps. The got rid of them a couple of years ago when they began using biometrics on all tickets.Yes, you can leave that park and rest, nap, or swim, maybe even DTD if you want and then return to that same park. They used to stamp your hand before you exited the park with that invisible stamp that doesnt wash off...when you return to the park they put the blacklight over your hand and it shows up. I do not know if they still do that. Anyone know? We have been using the park hopper option for many years now so its been a while. Hope that helped you Disneydudette!
So did you get the point then. It wasn't accidental.Funny, I thought the post began, like yours, with the words "no offense." Doesn't that mean, you know, "no offense?" :lookaroun
Very few things anywhere are priced purely on the basis of the cost of supplying it. Demand - ability and willingness to pay for something - matters too. If people are willing to pay more for to be allowed to visit multiple parks in one day it's not unusual that Disney would want to charge them something for the privilege.Offense/No offense- whatever.
How about this question, guys.
What does it cost Disney extra if someone park hops?
Example-
Guest A spends 8 hours in the MK.
Guest B spends 4 hours in the MK and 4 hours in EPCOT.
How did Guest B cost Disney anything extra?
In other words, why couldn't park hopping be just an integral part of going to WDW for everyone?
Is it due to the imbalance in the popularity of the individual parks maybe?
Tks.
![]()
The thing I dont understand is the no-expiration option. Would't it just be cheaper to buy APs?
I think you'd save a little with no-expiration if you were doing, say, two 5-day WDW trips, esp. if they are more than a year apart so an AP wouldn't make sense. (A 10-day with no expiration costs less than two 5-day tickets that expire.) But you might not make it back the second time; you might lose the tickets, etc., so paying for non expiration is risky.I thinkthat the cafeteria style of MYW tickets is great! I usually take the family for 7 days and we park hop every single one of those days so I pay for that option. I do not pay for the Water parks and more option because I live at the NJ shore and we have a couple of awesome water parks right near us so we don't go to the Disney parks and I wouldn't want to pay for them to be included if I didn't want to go there.
The thing I dont understand is the no-expiration option. Would't it just be cheaper to buy APs?
I think you'd save a little with no-expiration if you were doing, say, two 5-day WDW trips, esp. if they are more than a year apart so an AP wouldn't make sense. (A 10-day with no expiration costs less than two 5-day tickets that expire.) But you might not make it back the second time; you might lose the tickets, etc., so paying for non expiration is risky.
You kind of have to do some number crunching as it can go either way. If you can take 2 trips per year, even nearly a year apart (ie 2/1/7 to 2/8/7 and 1/24/8-1/31/8), and if you do them during a time when you can get an AP discount on a room an AP can save you a heap over MYW tickets.I thinkthat the cafeteria style of MYW tickets is great! I usually take the family for 7 days and we park hop every single one of those days so I pay for that option. I do not pay for the Water parks and more option because I live at the NJ shore and we have a couple of awesome water parks right near us so we don't go to the Disney parks and I wouldn't want to pay for them to be included if I didn't want to go there.
The thing I dont understand is the no-expiration option. Would't it just be cheaper to buy APs?
Very few things anywhere are priced purely on the basis of the cost of supplying it. Demand - ability and willingness to pay for something - matters too. If people are willing to pay more for to be allowed to visit multiple parks in one day it's not unusual that Disney would want to charge them something for the privilege.
Pricing on the basis of supply and demand instead of only supply can sometimes benefit guests. Suppose you buy a basic 10-day pass. The 10th day (the difference in price from a 9-day pass) only costs you $2 or so. But it obviously costs Disney a lot more than $2 to let you in the park the 10th day.
With the AP there is also the availability of having DDE card. Depending on where you eat the DDE can save you more than the Dining plan but again it requires a little number crunching to see if it works out with your particular situation.Good point. The same type of analysis probably goes into Disney's decision to offer the Dining Plan free, as an incentive, versus offering room discounts.
The addition of the Dining Plan to a Magic Your Way Vacation Package costs $38.99 per adult (age 10 and up) per night of stay
$10.99 per child 3-9 per night of stay
Offering $38.99 off on the price of a room would cost Disney that amount straight off the bottom line profits.
Offering the Dining Plan free, however, does not really cost them the full $38.99. It only costs them whatever portion of the real cost that the restaurants pass on, by agreement.
Also, past experience may have shown that offering free dining works better as an incentive than offering lower prices on the rooms.
Tks.
![]()
No offense meant, but i always find it fascinating that atleast once a month someone thinks they've outsmarted Disney with the whole parkhopper ticket system.
I've wondered about this myself, why they don't adjust room rates more instead of giving away dining plans. This year they actually moved a little in the direction of resort discounts over free dining. Specifically, value season rates for resorts begins more than 3 weeks earlier than last year (8/5 v. 8/29 if I remember right), and the free dining period has been shortened a little (starting late August v. mid August last year). But I had thought they might change things even more this fall, like half-price dining instead of free.Good point. The same type of analysis probably goes into Disney's decision to offer the Dining Plan free, as an incentive, versus offering room discounts.
The addition of the Dining Plan to a Magic Your Way Vacation Package costs $38.99 per adult (age 10 and up) per night of stay
$10.99 per child 3-9 per night of stay
Offering $38.99 off on the price of a room would cost Disney that amount straight off the bottom line profits.
Offering the Dining Plan free, however, does not really cost them the full $38.99. It only costs them whatever portion of the real cost that the restaurants pass on, by agreement.
Also, past experience may have shown that offering free dining works better as an incentive than offering lower prices on the rooms.
Tks.
![]()
I think you'd save a little with no-expiration if you were doing, say, two 5-day WDW trips, esp. if they are more than a year apart so an AP wouldn't make sense. (A 10-day with no expiration costs less than two 5-day tickets that expire.) But you might not make it back the second time; you might lose the tickets, etc., so paying for non expiration is risky.
Because the word "free" gets everyone's attention regardless if it is really true or not.I've wondered about this myself, why they don't adjust room rates more instead of giving away dining plans. This year they actually moved a little in the direction of resort discounts over free dining. Specifically, value season rates for resorts begins more than 3 weeks earlier than last year (8/5 v. 8/29 if I remember right), and the free dining period has been shortened a little (starting late August v. mid August last year). But I had thought they might change things even more this fall, like half-price dining instead of free.
Suppose you booked one resort for the full 8 days with DDP, but then once you're there you ask about switching to the other resort for the last 4 days. Surely they'd let you do that without making you pay for more than 1 day of separate 1 day tickets? Especially if you're asking to move from the moderate to the deluxe halfway through your stay?The other problem is that I would kind of like to stay at Wilderness Lodge for 4 days and POR for 4 days. However, in order to get the dining plan on each part of the stay, I would have to buy a two seperate one day tickets, in addition to my 5 days from last year's.
I don't believe they will. Even with just a simple resort switch I believe it has to be handled as 2 separate reservations let alone when a package is involved.Suppose you booked one resort for the full 8 days with DDP, but then once you're there you ask about switching to the other resort for the last 4 days. Surely they'd let you do that without making you pay for more than 1 day of separate 1 day tickets? Especially if you're asking to move from the moderate to the deluxe halfway through your stay?
You can enter the same park as many times as you wish during that day!drawing a total blank here but...
For our september we've opted NOT to upgrade to park hoppers. This will be a first for us...
Anyways... even with the base ticket... am I allowed to go to the MK in the morning...leave for a quick swim or nap... and come back to the MK in the afternoon/evening? Or am I "forced" to stay in the park the entire time?
thanks... had a total brain fart and didn't know :wave:
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.