Enderikari
Well-Known Member
Well...maybe.
If the Sentinel, for example, called me to see what I know about the Mansion refurb, I could tell them. They could then print the info, with the stipulation of "internet poster Lee says" or some such. They would not be irresponsible for doing so anymore than a source quoting...say...the Drudge Report. The world turns on inside information, the source of which will never, and should never, come to light.
Yeah, we're never gonna agree on Jim and Al, or on internet speculation and info leaking. Fun to bicker about, though! :lol:
Anyhow...wow...that DLR....growing by leaps and bounds, huh? Place won't be recognizable in 10 years time. DCA either.
Well, I already have my own problems with the Sentinal doing a majority of their "hard-hitting journalism" on internet message boards.
But, and this is a problem that every company is having these days, wasn't the Disney Theme Parks a lot more magical when everything was still kind of secret? When the whole world didn't know how things worked, or what new attraction was opening up? I seriously wish Disney would consider plugging some of the holes in their collective, to button things up a bit more... The last big secret Disney was able to spring properly was the Magic Your Way ticketing structure.
But back to my original point... "Internet Poster Lee" while credible amongst the board here, is not a credible source for a newspaper, being as that "Internet Poster Lee" is not a real person... I have no doubt that you could be (and probably have been) interviewed, and used as a credible source, but never as "Internet Poster Lee."
And about DLR, I would be happy if they widened a few pathways, maybe made their castle a bit taller... That's the kind of expansion I want to see.