I ran across an interesting article that consults expert-type people about human behavior and it deals with fan-obsession with something, in the article, the show Lost.
I think lots of parallels can be made to the little community here.
More then you want to know?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/14/AR2008031401084.html
Of particular interest...
And to all those who say we're spoiling it by discussing it so much here..
I think lots of parallels can be made to the little community here.
More then you want to know?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/14/AR2008031401084.html
Of particular interest...
No, we want more than that. We want answers, not breadcrumbs. But why?
After all, the mysteries people "solve" have never really been mysteries but rather things that the writers intended to reveal all along. And now that producers have announced that the series will end in two short years, why can't we just let ourselves sit back and be entertained?
The answer to that lies, partly, in the phenomenon that psychologists and behavioral economists call "dynamic inconsistency" -- our brain's inability to reconcile what we want now with what we will want later.
"Right now, you feel this overwhelming desire to know the outcome of something," says Jonathan Cohen, who researches dynamic inconsistency at Princeton. "In the future, when you're actually reading the last chapter you wonder why you couldn't wait."
This field of study is still new, but Cohen's team postulates that the drive for immediate gratification is located in our "lizard brains" -- the instinctual part that believes our needs must be met now. The uniquely human part of our brains, the patient part that can recognize the value of waiting and savoring and saving, often loses out to the reptile, even now, even after all this evolution.
And to all those who say we're spoiling it by discussing it so much here..
You're not even worried, despite dynamic inconsistency, about ruining future episodes for yourself: For guidance, you've contacted a Carnegie Mellon professor who studies TV viewing experiences. Joachim Vosgerau's experiments have shown that "spoiled" viewers can actually enjoy broadcasts as much as unspoiled ones -- they just focus more on the journey than on the outcome.