And are you suggesting that the media should ignore this angle?
Maybe not totally, but what is the "angle"? Just because he "may" have visited Disney Springs has absolutely no bearing on the attack that he eventually perpetrated. Maybe he likes Wetzel's Pretzels with a Ghirardelli ice cream sundae, so he visited Disney Springs, but that doesn't mean he was casing the place for an attack. Media saying so is just click bait to generate views, because we all know that saying "Disney" in any context of this story will get people to look.
So in your local news media, how many other places are they saying that he visited? Uni, SW? There is absolutely NO reason to think that he didn't visit City Walk if he visited Disney Springs, but I hear no one talking about that. There are also many other tourist destinations in the Orlando area, and yet, I hear nothing of him visiting any of those either.
He went to a local night club that had nothing to do with Disney, yet all of a sudden, since the Disney name is mentioned, there is a bunch of traffic about it. I just think that it's disingenuous for media to play that card every time, when it is so obvious that it is just to get more people to click and view, even though there is ZERO proof that he had any intention of ever targeting Disney.
And if you honestly believe that the news media nowadays is not going to find an "angle" to get more clicks, then you are most certainly naive, even if you were part of it in the past. The news media of today is NOTHING like the past when they actually reported news, and only the news. Now they have to sensationalize everything, and they have to be first, even if some of the information is wrong. They did not used to work that way.