I chuckle at those who believe $DIS at $95/share is "a bargain". There's still plenty of air to be let out of the Iger-inflated stock balloon. The stock should be around $60/share, all things being equal.
I will second this. Iger is correct on this one for sure.Then why do most analysts peg $DIS between $120 and $140?
Seriously, no. For all his flaws, Iger is 100% in the right here. There is no excuse for retaliating against freedom of speech, and there's no moral equivalency between the two of them. Criticize Iger all you want for other things, but he is making all the right moves when it comes to the stupid fight that DeSantis won't let go.
So, instead of spending $18 billion in Floridia, Disney will only be spending $17 billion.
I can’t help but think how Josh being directly involved in this situation is CEO prep."...I hope we’re able to do so." -Josh <wink, wink, nudge, nudge>
I'm neither inferring nor implying anything other than it's a logical, business decision thing. Disney apparently finds it convenient to announce it in the context of their ongoing dispute with the state over ownership of RCID. I find it disingenuous to blame this decision on that dispute.So by inference you are saying this was a good thing. Right.
MaybeI can’t help but think how Josh being directly involved in this situation is CEO prep.
Of course first and foremost it’s Iger making these shots, but Josh’s name and statements have been just as heavily involved due to his Chairman position.. I could see it.
Because Bob has successfully convinced them that there is a never-ending pot of magical consumers ready, willing, and able to spend copious amounts of money in the theme parks. In other words:Then why do most analysts peg $DIS between $120 and $140?
Well maybe today’s news from wall street could put a little damper on these predictions.I will second this. Iger is correct on this one for sure.
Disney does not pay taxes on land and assets owned by RCID, and if RCID did not exist, Disney would have to own the land, and the assets on the land, so Disney would have to pay property taxes on many, many more assets every year. They also would have to pay normal taxes instead of being able to fund it with tax exempt municipal bonds and the like, just like every other company in the State of Florida has to do.RCID was not a tax break for Disney. They paid, and continue to pay, much more in taxes because of RCID. RCID gave Disney control over their land. That is all.
Disney needs to run ads about this fact. Disabuse the public of the governor’s false narrative.
Where does the RCID get the money to pay its land taxes?Disney does not pay taxes on land and assets owned by RCID
and if RCID did not exist, Disney would have to own the land, and the assets on the land
Just like the infrastructure that serves the other Orlando theme parks, almost all of the infrastructure that RCID owns would almost certainly be built and maintained by the counties, not Disney.This is a lie, its already been debunked. Disney does not pay taxes on land and assets owned by RCID, and if RCID did not exist, Disney would have to own the land, and the assets on the land, so Disney would have to pay property taxes on many, many more assets every year. They also would have to pay normal taxes instead of being able to fund it with tax exempt municipal bonds and the like, just like every other company in the State of Florida has to do.
Municipal Govs don't pay land taxes And neither does RCID from what I see.Where does the RCID get the money to pay its land taxes?
'could have'This is also not necessarily true. If RCID did not exist, much of this infrastructure probably would have been created by the counties, Disney would have cut deals with the counties to have them build a lot of the infrastructure. Some of it may have been paid for by Disney and then been private, but utilities, through-roads, etc, very well could have been done by the government as is the case with many other parks and businesses in the state.
Then why is UNI paying for so much infrastructure build out even now? This premise of 'counties would have done it if RCID didn't' is rose colored glasses. Counties would have constrained what could have been done under municipal ownership for the very reason RCID was there to start with... because the counties were so constrained.Just like the infrastructure that serves the other Orlando theme parks, almost all of the infrastructure that RCID owns would almost certainly be built and maintained by the counties, not Disney.
The delta isn't just on taxes paid. The delta comes in cost to build as well - as noted in the RCID garage build out... the savings in costs was millions as a municipal project vs a private just in taxes on materials.But, let’s take your hypothetical. Let’s say that all of the infrastructure in RCID was privately-owned by Disney and Disney had to pay property taxes on that land/those assets. Reedy Creek charges 13.9 mills in property taxes on Disney’s property today. That is more than 50% of all property taxes Disney pays on their land (27.5 mills). And Disney already owns about 70% of the land in the district.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.