That ONLY is hyperbole.I know this debate will just go in circles, buuut one last time:
No, I'm not saying this at all. Universal has ONLY ever once gone all in, and it's with Diagon Alley.
Again, Disney is not free of this criticism but they have far more examples of doing it completely right throughout their hishistory.
I disagree, many rides and experiences at Uni have done things better. Just one obvious example, Disney has still not done an indoor coaster as themed as Revenge of The Mummy, but even if you don't feel feel that way...
Hagrids and DK were never going to be as thematically solid as Big Thunder as Hagrids is a big thrill and not diegetically themed as a hyper real train on track. It's goals are different. Designers know this.
DK is zany and jumps the track as a main gimmick lf it's visual thrill and is a supporting attraction.
There is a reason all of Disney's better coasters are themed to trains or in the dark or if outdoors they end up stuck with odd coasters themed to coasters.
Even their newer indoor ones don't go all in. It gets repetitive.
Disney is probably worse at this than anyone. Detailed dimensional queue for Mermaid and then loading station is a mural and warehouse ceiling with static figures.
It's goal was to be a supporting dark ride ticket.
DK will be the mermaid of the area in this regard.
In 1990. Universal Def went all in and made a movie studio park 100 percent. Better than what Disney had created with their same mission.
The goal of a movie studio theme park was far superior at Universal.
For you to say Uni never went all in tells me you never rode Kongfrontation. I don't think there has been a world of detail that great since. I am getting hints of it from the images of ministry queue though. What was not 100 percent about Amity Island?
Your hyperbole that Diagon is the only time is totally unfounded.
Last edited: