dcibrando
Well-Known Member
It's thoughts like this that led to UNM, which was (IMO) the worst thing to happen to the MK since the giant birthday cake castle.
Times and audiences change, but that does not mean that every 5 years we should be swapping out rides and attractions. Some types of entertainment should be considered timeless. There has to be a good balance of Old vs. New, of "Excitement" vs. Nostalgia. My nephews were riding It's a Small World with us on our last trip and were treating it like it was some form of punishment, but that does not mean that IASM should be ripped up and replaced by some crazy simulator thrill-ride.
Nostalgia and timelessness are powerful things. One of the things that keeps me coming back is to be able to take my children on things I knew and loved as a child. To be able to capture, if only for that brief moment, that sense of childhood wonder. The parks do not need to be museums, and should keep pushing forward, but with a sense of respect to the past, and a sense of balance in it's entertainment and attraction offerings.
One thing I think Disney should do MORE of is whenever they DO replace an old ride, is include something from it in the new ride. I actually think it would be awesome if one of the Innovation buildings to be like a museum/warehouse full of "stuff" from Walt Disney World past attractions...(and maybe even a glimpse of the up and coming) and I think it would fit the theme as well and be a HUGE draw from the fan...old and new plus an attraction that would cost them relatively nothing