Tim Lohr
Well-Known Member
Well the trains may or may not have seen more passengers in the first 20 to 25 years, because there was no bus stop at the front door of the Magic Kingdom back then. All the resort buses went to the Transportation and Ticket Center, and then you could get a Monorail to either Magic Kingdom or Epcot from there, but now none of the resort buses go to the TTC. It seems like mainly the people who stay off site, or the non resort guests, are the only ones using the monorail, which is kind of crazy, but that's probably why they haven't spent any money on the trains since then.This gets referenced a lot, but are we sure that the old trains weren't replaced more frequently because they had to be? That is, either they weren't designed for longevity or that they had drawbacks so there was clear incentives for replacements? I mean, I'm sure that the increased importance of economic drivers to management was a big part of it but as an engineer, it doesn't surprise me when I hear that versions 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 came in quick succession before things stabilized a bit more with version 4.0. Or version 3.1, ha!
So new trains may suggest a change to the entire Monorail system. There were plans in the 1970's to fuse the Magic Kingdom Express Monorail line with the Epcot line, which would be a much more efficient way to move people around the property. Walt's original "Progress City" plans for the "Florida Project" had one central Monorail that ran the length of the property, with 4 different stops on it, and that would still be the best system today, to have one Monorail line that connects all parks, and then have secondary mass transit systems like the Skyliner gondolas to transport guests from the resorts to the nearest monorail station. That would greatly reduce the need for buses, and the cost of maintaining and fueling buses and paying the bus driver's salaries...
long story short, maybe the reason you haven't seen any upgrades in the monorail trains in the past 30 years, is because they've been investing money on buses instead