tirian
Well-Known Member
That’s nearly SOP in serious storms. Everything but the lock-in.Lock them in a gift shop til the weather clears.......
That’s nearly SOP in serious storms. Everything but the lock-in.Lock them in a gift shop til the weather clears.......
I think taking that comment personally is a bit much. If we ALL lived by the rule of taking shelter every time lightning was within TEN MILES of our location what would that look like? While a lightning strike is tragic and dangerous, it’s obviously exceedingly rare or we WOULD all live by that 10 mile rule.
My question is largely around whether 10 miles is a reasonable cutoff or overly conservative
And gondola systems elsewhere? That’s what this is about — not sporting venues or theme parks in general. Do they shut down when lightning is within 10 miles? Is that the normal threshold?Personally? Not really, except I've seen enough up close and personal from working at Disney and Silver Dollar City (sorry, NDA's don't allow me to go into detail on that), know personally a couple of people who suffered the consequences of lack of safety and awareness, and when working at SDC had to constantly deal with people upset when we wouldn't run the train because of lightning. Is it personal? No, I just am familiar with the other side vs those who don't want to be.
And reasonably cutoff? Most outdoor pro sporting events now follow similar rules. I know of several local fairs that do as well for anything outdoors, and both of our local raceways have a rule that if there is lightning within 10 miles- even if it's going the opposite direction- the stands are emptied and the races are on hold until it's well out of range. Or, like I said, pretty much every theme or amusement park in North America. There is most definitely a growing awareness of the danger of lightning from a distance, whether to people, operations, equipment or otherwise. Just many individuals haven't caught up on that yet.
Personally? Not really, except I've seen enough up close and personal from working at Disney and Silver Dollar City (sorry, NDA's don't allow me to go into detail on that), know personally a couple of people who suffered the consequences of lack of safety and awareness, and when working at SDC had to constantly deal with people upset when we wouldn't run the train because of lightning. Is it personal? No, I just am familiar with the other side vs those who don't want to be.
And reasonably cutoff? Most outdoor pro sporting events now follow similar rules. I know of several local fairs that do as well for anything outdoors, and both of our local raceways have a rule that if there is lightning within 10 miles- even if it's going the opposite direction- the stands are emptied and the races are on hold until it's well out of range. Or, like I said, pretty much every theme or amusement park in North America. There is most definitely a growing awareness of the danger of lightning from a distance, whether to people, operations, equipment or otherwise. Just many individuals haven't caught up on that yet.
And gondola systems elsewhere? That’s what this is about — not sporting venues or theme parks in general. Do they shut down when lightning is within 10 miles? Is that the normal threshold?
I’m confused — Tampa Bay Times is biased? In any case... Like I said: just two quick links I found — I even said I didn’t find much that was useful and that’s why I’m asking the question here in hopes that someone who actually knows how these systems are run IN PRACTICE might respond.It does have relevancy because they are all plans to deal with the same risk. Pools do the same thing, with similar type of radius.. as do outdoor amusement rides.
You are fixated on gondolas as somehow different... they aren't really different in that they are trying to avoid the same risks.
And the cited article is not really addressing your question. Being able to handle a strike... is not necessarily the same thing as mandate to RUN during lightning storms. The comments (which are all unsourced, and hearsay, on a naturally biased site to begin with) are not absolute to mean the system would run unhindered. Simply that the systems are designed to survive lightning strikes.
Just like airoplanes are designed to be safe from lightning strikes... but pilots still avoid the storms and there still are risks.. even tho we say its safe to do so.
In the case of something like Disney or other entities... they can lean towards more than 'safe to do so' and instead opt for minimized risk.
I’m confused — Tampa Bay Times is biased? In any case... Like a I said: just two quick links I found — I even said I didn’t find much that was useful and that’s why I’m asking the question here in hopes that someone who actually knows how these systems are run IN PRACTICE might respond.
The text body you quoted was what I was responding to. The TB newspaper article you also linked cited a consultant who said
"You cannot run a gondola in a lightning storm is the problem, you would have to shut down, but that is typically not for long."
Where he directly says you shutdown... but "is typically not for long"
I did a quick google search as I’m running between appointments now and didn’t find much that was useful... and some contradictory...
I said in my first post that some of what I found was contradictory, right??
The Gondola zone is less than ten miles. I missed where that number came from? Edit: found it.I think taking that comment personally is a bit much. If we ALL lived by the rule of taking shelter every time lightning was within TEN MILES of our location what would that look like? While a lightning strike is tragic and dangerous, it’s obviously exceedingly rare or we WOULD all live by that 10 mile rule.
My question is largely around whether 10 miles is a reasonable cutoff or overly conservative if you’re going to run a system like this in FL in the summer. Given how unreliable this made their express bus transportation, I’m surprised they’d put in a system that would be as unreliable for a chunk of the year. Unless they’re going to use something LESS than the 10 mile cutoff??
The bottom line to me — as someone who visits WDW every August when this is a near-daily occurrence — is that the gondolas are now a nonstarter for me. I don’t want to count on that and then have to be diverted frequently (like exactly what happened with the defunct express bus transportation) so we’ll skip them altogether. And this puts the nail in the coffin of any consideration of buying at Riviera (we were not likely to do it but were considering if point cost wasn’t ridiculous).
And I’d love confirmation from someone who knows that gondola systems elsewhere actually observe a 10 mile rule wrt lightning.
THANK YOU!!! Another poster stated 10miles — I’ve heard it quoted elsewhere in the past, but it isn’t something that I know for a fact AT ALL.The Gondola zone is less than ten miles. I missed where that number came from?
The Gondola zone is less than ten miles. I missed where that number came from? Edit: found it.
Thank you. Rhino Rally... that’s a (fun) blast from the past.I wasn't sure what the gondola zone actually was. I used 10 miles as a measure as it is a commonly used one for outdoor attractions that are generally larger than a flat ride in most places.
I guess I could have used Rhino Rally's old lightning designation, which was 7 miles. And those were in rovers that were supposed to be as safe in a lightning strike as a car is. We still shut those down as a safety precaution..
Again: what is the threshold distance away for “lightning in the area” for other gondola systems?? Did I miss that info here repeatedly? If so, please point me to it. That’s been my question for pages now. All you’ve said is sometimes they shut down for lightning. I know that. That doesn’t help anyone gauge reliability in FL summers.And @MickeyMinnieMom it's already been stated, but you've missed it repeatedly- yes, other gondola systems shut down for lightning. In fact when I was at Vail, Colorado a couple of summers ago they shut one down just before we were going to get on due to lightning. And I've seen the one in Palm Springs close as well.
The poster had it marked as light rail, which would most likely be at ground level, instead as elevated in the way the Skyliner or Monorail are.The current lines run right through parking lots, so I don't see that as a limiting factor.
Light rail, people mover, etc. are not limited to straight lines as is a gondola lift; the tracks can be routed any way that's convenient (subject to minimum turn radius, of course.) At ground level, they're also less sensitive to sight lines.The poster had it marked as light rail, which would most likely be at ground level, instead as elevated in the way the Skyliner or Monorail are.
Caribbean Beach has bus stops that could be utilized if there is an issue departing from that station.Ah! Ok. It was my understanding that at Riviera you had to transfer also. I should have said at "Caribbean Beach", when you have to transfer ... will they allow guests continue to their final destinations or will you have to ... find your way.
Correct, however my post was that the poster, as they had designed in the picture, would not be feasible as it didn't take into account the planned construction of the Swan\Dolphin expansion hotel in the area they designated as a route. I could see a light rail running from AK Lodge - AK - BB - CSR - YC\BC - EPCOT, with a terminus at or near the EPCOT bus dropoff, which would look more feasible than trying to turn the Skyliner turn station into some kind of Light rail \ Skyliner \ Friendship Boat transportation center. That would give access to transfer to Monorail to MK area.Light rail, people mover, etc. are not limited to straight lines as is a gondola lift; the tracks can be routed any way that's convenient (subject to minimum turn radius, of course.) At ground level, they're also less sensitive to sight lines.
10 miles is the norm for any ride that takes time to shut down. Remember if lightning strikes 10 miles away, its going to take several minutes to cycle down, by which time the storm could be completely overhead.I think taking that comment personally is a bit much. If we ALL lived by the rule of taking shelter every time lightning was within TEN MILES of our location what would that look like? While a lightning strike is tragic and dangerous, it’s obviously exceedingly rare or we WOULD all live by that 10 mile rule.
My question is largely around whether 10 miles is a reasonable cutoff or overly conservative if you’re going to run a system like this in FL in the summer. Given how unreliable this made their express bus transportation, I’m surprised they’d put in a system that would be as unreliable for a chunk of the year. Unless they’re going to use something LESS than the 10 mile cutoff??
The bottom line to me — as someone who visits WDW every August when this is a near-daily occurrence — is that the gondolas are now a nonstarter for me. I don’t want to count on that and then have to be diverted frequently (like exactly what happened with the defunct express bus transportation) so we’ll skip them altogether. And this puts the nail in the coffin of any consideration of buying at Riviera (we were not likely to do it but were considering if point cost wasn’t ridiculous).
And I’d love confirmation from someone who knows that gondola systems elsewhere actually observe a 10 mile rule wrt lightning.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.