mikejs78
Premium Member
I do get what you’re saying. However, as a customer, I care that the transportation is efficient for me to use. Reliable, as quick as possible, clean, etc. A proven model in this area is a good thing IMO.It's "cheaped out" in the sense they did not take the bold path of innovative transportation and just stuck with regular off the shelf stuff. The monorail wasn't picked because it was the most effective - it was Walt's folly in the sense he thought it represented the idea of clean, safe, integrated transportation and Disney continued with that in WDW. Same with the peoplemover... they (like many of the EPCOT ideals implemented in WDW) were intended to be inspirational models to show how the future could be. The relative uniqueness of the installations added to the mystique. Original WDW transportation concepts were bold.
So at WDW, they were unique-ish, futuristic, bold, and tied into the better future that WDW was selling... Now? "disney is spending to fix crowded buses and roads" and that's about it. That's how even tho Disney is doing something 'on their own' -- it still lacks the credit that prior choices have.
The Skyliner lacks the bold innovation and statements in transportation that other alternatives would have made. Like large scale autonomous vehicles, pods, etc.
But what? I think the idea is that they just sort of disappear by not drawing attention. I can certainly imagine worse things for the towers. Like those tacky Minnie Mouse cars driving around property. Do we really want to see red towers with polka dots? Instead of complaining, we should probably all be thanking Disney for using some restraint for once.
Is there something that is inherently more attractive about monorail beams, by the way? Especially ones that are covered with black mold and grime?
Not me! I won’t miss the smell of wet bandaids and kitty litter. Or being packed like sardines. Or trying to climb over strollers that are bigger than my first car.
There’s a good chance these won’t have the odor issues the monorails have. The buses have no issues with odor like the monorails have.You seem to be under the assumption that these won’t eventually have the same stink... I am happy they’re coming, for efficiency purposes and kinetic purposes. I liked the old gondola ride (although views of roof tops weren’t always that appealing). I’m sure it’ll all look much nicer when the towers are all tensioned and there is traffic moving on them.
I like the look of clean monorail beams than the towers, yes. Still infrastructure I know, but the more simplistic design of the beams aren’t visually as obstructive. That said, if they were clean they’d be a whole lot nicer looking! Yes, it’s possible to look at an issue (even on this forum) and see the pros and cons. You don’t have to be one extreme or the other for everything. If you prefer those conversations, we can jump over to the GOTG thread...
Last week while getting on one (forget the color) at the Contemporary, lady gets in and says it smells like a horse barn, girl says it smells like goats...lolWe must have had good monorail karma, because up until our trip last month, we were never in a monorail car with a really foul odor. Probably because I was thinking that this complaint was much ado about not-too-much, we rode in one that the description "stink" doesn't begin to cover it. I'll refrain from posting all of the things the kids said it smelled like... just truly disgusting. I can't believe they didn't try to do something about it before letting people ride in it -- that bad.
That may be a contributing factor to the decision to use wood slat benches vs. upholstered seats. The wood is easier to keep clean and won’t trap odors.There’s a good chance these won’t have the odor issues the monorails have. The buses have no issues with odor like the monorails have.
You seem to be under the assumption that these won’t eventually have the same stink...
Uh.. what?
The first problem is you keep arguing efficiencies without stating efficiencies of WHAT.
Buses have lower per person efficiencies compared to a heavy haul, higher capacity vehicle...(in terms of customers per cycle) but offset that with the ability to scale horizontally and the much greater advantage of scaling up AND down.
These discussions will always go in circles until you are both discussing the same thing.
Are you optimizing equipment costs, labor, travel time, wait time, etc.
Remember... there are solid reasons why all transportation systems are layered systems of different types.. almost always ending up with bus on the edge.
Buses reign supreme for flexible demand with route diversity.
Very likely.That may be a contributing factor to the decision to use wood slat benches vs. upholstered seats. The wood is easier to keep clean and won’t trap odors.
You seem to be under the assumption that these won’t eventually have the same stink...
No assumption needed. The bulk of the monorail’s foul smell comes from poorly maintained AC units filled with mildew/mold. The rest comes from the idiotic decision to have upholstered seats and carpeted walls inside of the cabins. No AC, upholstery, or carpet in the gondolas. Smaller scale, of course, but those of us who remember riding the old Skyway to Fantasyland/Tomorrowland buckets probably don’t have any foul smells associated with those memories. I know I don’t.
^This. Geez people. If you don't melt or spontaneously combust waking down main Street you aren't going to in the gondola either. It isn't like leaving a kid in a car with the windows closed. The ventilation will make it so the interior temperature is similar to the exterior temperature. If you can survive outside you will be fine inside.
There's a psychological component.
Being hot out on the street - Main Street, or any street USA or otherwise - is quite different than being hot in an enclosed box.
Threre's a psychological component, indeed.
I think this is a valid point. It’s not just cheaper it’s a lack of appetite to take a real risk. More innovative and less proven transportation would have been way more risky. These types of systems are pretty well tested worldwide and outside of getting Americans to accept that a gondola can be used for something other than skiing they pose very little chance of failure. They also have a pretty constant and known cost to operate and maintain. With anything new you always run the risk of unforeseen issues resulting in more costs downstream.It's "cheaped out" in the sense they did not take the bold path of innovative transportation and just stuck with regular off the shelf stuff. The monorail wasn't picked because it was the most effective - it was Walt's folly in the sense he thought it represented the idea of clean, safe, integrated transportation and Disney continued with that in WDW. Same with the peoplemover... they (like many of the EPCOT ideals implemented in WDW) were intended to be inspirational models to show how the future could be. The relative uniqueness of the installations added to the mystique. Original WDW transportation concepts were bold.
So at WDW, they were unique-ish, futuristic, bold, and tied into the better future that WDW was selling... Now? "disney is spending to fix crowded buses and roads" and that's about it. That's how even tho Disney is doing something 'on their own' -- it still lacks the credit that prior choices have.
The Skyliner lacks the bold innovation and statements in transportation that other alternatives would have made. Like large scale autonomous vehicles, pods, etc.
I think we need to wait to see if that proves out. Similar systems in warm climates seem to work fine around the world. It may be the case that the anticipation of an unpleasant experience is way worse than the actual experience. I think most guests won’t be bothered because they won’t even know there is no AC until they board the gondolas and with the motion and moving air it won’t seem like an issue. Only a very small fraction of actual system users obsess over everything Disney like we do. There are some people here who have already decided it’s going to be too hot. When you go in looking for a problem you are sure to find one.But there is.
Whether it effects you or I is besides the point.
There is an absolute psychological component of anxiety that effects people in smaller spaces, and being hot and humid in a small enclosed space that one cannot step out of - whether it's a 5 or 10 minute ride, vs being the same temp on terra firma effects different people in different ways.
A damp bink lobbing swords at passers by... I love that sceneYou can't expect to wield supreme executive power just 'cause some watery tart threw a sword at you
I did the Gondolas in Hong Kong to the top of Lantau Island...It was a very hot humid day there, and the car was comfortable and pleasant...of course they are a lot higher than the WDW system will be, but it should be ok...I think we need to wait to see if that proves out. Similar systems in warm climates seem to work fine around the world. It may be the case that the anticipation of an unpleasant experience is way worse than the actual experience. I think most guests won’t be bothered because they won’t even know there is no AC until they board the gondolas and with the motion and moving air it won’t seem like an issue. Only a very small fraction of actual system users obsess over everything Disney like we do. There are some people here who have already decided it’s going to be too hot. When you go in looking for a problem you are sure to find one.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.