WildcatDen
Well-Known Member
Are you fairly tall or standing on a step ladder?I like whizzing 3 to 4 feet over the ground .
Are you fairly tall or standing on a step ladder?I like whizzing 3 to 4 feet over the ground .
3. Just deal with the bubble break. You are riding in a cabin in the sky so you are going to see some less than attractive back stage stuff.It's been mentioned in this thread already how to mitigate seeing backstage:
1. Automated opaquing glass.
2. Low traveling gondolas. Except to go over a roadways, gondolas could theoretically be just 10 feet off the ground.
Dueling gondolas!
Would they be racing each other or jousting?
I see some other Disney fan sites have started to run with this story. Waiting to see how long before the main stream media picks it up.
Thumbs up to the site that did acknowledge us, and thumbs down to the one that didn't (you can guess which one that was).
There are / were plans to reconfigure the bus / taxi area at DHS as part of the lot reconfiguration.If you look at where it lands at DHS, it's consistent with pushing security out further from the entrance point there as well. The bus dropoff would need to be reconfigured too, unless you screen before you get on the buses somehow.
True. The Skyway in MK operated for decades and showed guests an eyeful of rooftops and backstage stuff. I still enjoyed it.3. Just deal with the bubble break. You are riding in a cabin in the sky so you are going to see some less than attractive back stage stuff.
There are / were plans to reconfigure the bus / taxi area at DHS as part of the lot reconfiguration.
Seriously. Who cares. This is transportation, not an attraction. You see backstage areas from busses already.3. Just deal with the bubble break. You are riding in a cabin in the sky so you are going to see some less than attractive back stage stuff.
Not sure if this is helpful at all, but I found this awhile ago and it seems to show the bus loop reconfiguration. No gondola building though, but that could likely be because the building was irrelevant to these particular plans.
2. Low traveling gondolas. Except to go over a roadways, gondolas could theoretically be just 10 feet off the ground.
They were saying the London system handles 10+ people per car and dispatches every 15 seconds... An average bus at capacity is 50 people and dispatches every 20 minutes + Even if the gondolas dispatch every minute, it is still faster loading than a bus...and will not be hampered by street traffic... Seems like it would be worlds more efficient than the bus transportation.
It's not that bad, I've trained to do it. The mechanism to do it is easy, it's the handholding of the people stranded which is the real challenge.I would think another benefit to a low travel system is evac as well (or god fordid castrophic failure of something). I don't know how many pods are normally strung out on a line at a time, but I imagine if a major issue occured causing the cable line to be inoperable, evac'ing multiple pods at a high elevation would be a nightmare for both guests and emergency crews.
They've been thinking about it for decades. It was always accepted the busses were finite.
They've looked at monorail. Personal pods. Boats. Trolley systems. And now this.
If they can negate weather stoppages it's appeal is clear. Relatively simple, relatively cheap and relatively reliable.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.