This is totally divorced from the actual conversation happening in the DAS and ex-DAS community. There may be a tiny minority who actually feel that way, but many of us are able to recognize the opportunity costs of the old excessively generous system— the two most critical are (1) extremely long and unpredictable LLs making it hard for the families who need DAS most to actually access the rides and (2) when the system is too generous it’s going to encourage more DAS misuse and abuse, which will result in even further tightening of accommodations for the people who really need it.After catching up on this thread all I will say is it’s amazing how important it is to some that disabled people get that absolute minimum required by law, and not an inch more.
Sad to see.
I don’t know if many of the people accusing others (and Disney) of being heartless really can’t comprehend these problems or they just don’t want to accept it. Here’s an example to make it even more obvious: if only the one person who needs it is allowed to use AQR, it’s pretty unlikely they are going to fake anxiety or IBS so they can go ride a bunch of short wait attractions without their group. Once you expand it to two people, it starts to look like an interesting (but unethical) park “hack” to people who feel Disney owes them something for the same reasons they used to justify lying to get DAS. Additionally, it doubles use of LL for every person who uses AQR.
I haven’t been to WDW since the new system was rolled out, for all I know Disney is allowing a companion and if they are, that’s great news for me and my family— I’m not going to be upset about it— but those of us support limits aren’t doing it because we hate people with disabilities, I would assume many/most here are AQR or DAS users or travel with someone who is.