TheMaxRebo
Well-Known Member
I think what's off putting the most to some folks is that this really is a two-fold change. Yes, it's to weed out rampant abuse. But they are also absolutely restricting access to a different class of disabled people, so to speak. As in, there are absolutely legitimately disabled people who used the service for many years who no longer will be able to. And I totally can appreciate the frustration with that fact. However, I'm optimistic that the accommodations offered at each attraction will be sufficient.
I was hoping with this change they would have more formal and structured accomodations - maybe even retiring the DAS name and instead having accomodations A, B, C, etc and informing people that based one what they have said the accomodations most suited is B (or whatever) which will directly address you concern via X, Y, and Z .... Now, some may still have not been satisfied as it might not be as beneficial as what DAS gave them, but I think at least if would feel that their concerns were taken seriously and attempted to be addressed. Vs now it is just "we have a program, you no longer qualify, instead talk to CM at each attraction to see if/how they can address" (at least in some cases)
Now, maybe that variability and level of customization will in practice work and be even better, but at a time people are feeling a lot of uncertainty I think it only increases that vas making them feel heard and confident in how their trip will go