In my opinion it’s unfair that she would be excluded because she doesn’t have autism as the reports I’ve seen seem to be saying but also if that’s the way Disney wants to go then so be it as it’s their business.
There are people with autism being denied DAS as well. WDW is trying to open new alternatives to address different common issues, and leave DAS for a very specific set of needs. I think they used autism as an example because that’s expected to be a significant number of who is meeting the new criteria. It is not diagnosis alone. That’s why some people without developmental disabilities have still been granted DAS and some with autism were not.
I don’t know how this will all play out. If the goal is to reduce the overall impact, that could also loosen things up so alternative accommodations can function better. I
think that’s part of the plan. Maybe your request is granted. Maybe the parks starts flowing better which improves the potential for alternative assistance, standby, and G+.
Last trip we spent 3 park days with family who included us on their DAS. We bought G+ on some days without them and wanted to buy it for us all on those shared park days. They asked us not to because it overcomplicated everything. That seemed odd to me but made sense after experiencing 3 park days of each: standby, Genie+ and DAS.
Realistically standby and DAS should be averaging around the same amount of park experience, and Genie+ getting a little extra or shaving off some time. It was eye-opening to see DAS in action. I totally get where it is necessary for some families to even make a trip possible or how some parties struggle... but Standby and Genie+ don’t come close DAS’s potential in elevating park experience. I was not expecting it to make such a big difference. Between rides, meals and exploring, it took almost half the time it normally takes my immediate family to do the same. Not the case for everyone. How far from typical though? The more DAS was used, the more need it caused, the more difference it made, etc. Rolling snowball effect. Is that what they’re trying to dial back.
Not sure what my extended family will decide if they not longer qualify for DAS. They generally do short park days regardless, so I’m thinking they might still go? I don’t know. They weren’t doing ropedrop or buying G+/ILL. There’s room for a new strategy, especially if alternative assistance can fill what gaps remain. I’m interested to hear his take on this. Besides using DAS, he works with disabled in NYC.