…the decline of common sense is to blame. I always side with freedom of expression…but that is dignified and doesn’t cross the line to putting yourself on display for effect.Hopefully this is indeed true. I'm super supportive of folks having the chance to be themselves at work, I think it certainly helps boost morale; but a firm and fair dress code is needed again. The last few visits the number of generally disheveled CMs was sad to see.
The policy itself has changed, its “lack of enforcement” comes from the vague wording. Also as a CM I wouldn’t say that anyone is going over the top with these relaxed rules.Indeed, now that the hiring pool is getting better, the enforcement will slowly return.
Yeah, they built inclusion as one of the pillars of the company. If they start firing people based off of what they look like, I’ll be pretty let down.
Indeed, if you read his Twitter chain, he's saying they're simply enforcing the "new look" that came out in 2021. Apparently, CMs were going beyond the new rules and it wasn't being enforced. It seems that during a labor shortage, managers didn't want to lose the help.This isn't a reversal of the previous changes to the Disney look. They will remain in place. Since the changes, and due in part to the lack of staffing, enforcement of any appearance standards has been non-existent and this is an attempt to restart some of that enforcement. Things being emphasized now are very objective rules like hair styles, hair color, nail color and the like. Rules regarding how Cast Members present themselves (with regard to inclusion) are not being changed.
My understanding: Having someone assigned female at birth donning a conventionally more masculine dress on Main Street meets the key of inclusion. Having gauges or dyed neon hair does not meet the key of show.Indeed, if you read his Twitter chain, he's saying they're simply enforcing the "new look" that came out in 2021. Apparently, CMs were going beyond the new rules and it wasn't being enforced. It seems that during a labor shortage, managers didn't want to lose the help.
The Tweeter was using pink-dyed hair, which isn't part of the 'new look' as an example. So... don't know where you're getting your point about gender-neutral costuming, which is indeed part of the new look.My understanding: Having someone assigned female at birth donning a conventionally more masculine dress on Main Street meets the key of inclusion. Having gauges or dyed neon hair does not meet the key of show.
The show key is being reinforced, the inclusion key is not being modified.
General response to people who didn't read the tweets.The Tweeter was using pink-dyed hair, which isn't part of the 'new look' as an example. So... don't know where you're getting your point about gender-neutral costuming, which is indeed part of the new look.
The problem isn't gender-neutral costuming, it's gendered costuming being worn by the opposite gender. Shout out to the bearded fellow in the Harbour House dress and bonnet.So... don't know where you're getting your point about gender-neutral costuming, which is indeed part of the new look.
Hey he showed up to work that’s all we can askThe problem isn't gender-neutral costuming, it's gendered costuming being worn by the opposite gender. Shout out to the bearded fellow in the Harbour House dress and bonnet.
That's nice to hear. If some cast don't come to work isn't that attendance policy still in effect?Hey he showed up to work that’s all we can ask
Perfect!gender-neutral costuming, which is indeed part of the new look.
Ahh…I love Minnesota/WisconsinThat's nice to hear. If some cast don't come to work isn't that attendance policy still in effect?
Ahh…I love Minnesota/Wisconsin
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.