New 2010 logo merchandise at Epcot's Mouse Gear

[SMRT-1]

it was only a matter of time until they threw some mickey ears on SSE....hope it stays on just the shirt. i'd like to see some more retro stuff out this year.

 

[goreesha]

It's annoying how they push it as twenty-ten. Two thousand-ten just sounds so much cooler (and numerically correct).

Hey now, according to the National Association of Good Grammar, twenty-ten is correct.

http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-01-01/news/17466340_1_youtube-videos-grammar-twenty-ten

Let's not tempt the National Association of Good Grammar to lay the smack down. :lookaroun

 

[cymbaldiva]

Thanks for the update! I really don't like any of it at all, but that's a good thing 'cause it makes me a little less bitter about not being there - I hate missing out on the good stuff!

 

[Andrew54]

Im disapointed that I went in 2009 and didnt even get a shirt because they were out of them everywhere.

 

[Zummi Gummi]

Any nice hoodies this year?

 

[Susan Savia]

Can't wait to see it in person...23 days!!

 

[GMRO]

I agree that these first pics, that I've seen, are much better than the 2009 stuff. Last May we came back with the least amount of shirts as we didn't really like anything we saw.

Tradition for my wife and I are new hats the first day we arrive and a mix of shirts - sometimes matching for the year.

Personally I've been saying twenty-10. BUT I'm sort of liking 2K10 a little the more I use it. Gets people thinking...:drevil:
Many thanks for the pics! Can't wait till this May for our trip.

 

[DisneyDreamer08]

Hey guys, this is random, and perhaps irrelevant since I don't think I will going to Disney in 2010, but do you know what the saying is for the long sleeve tees? I got one in 08 that says "Where Magic Lives" and one in 09 that says "Four Parks, One World". Those long sleeve tees are my favorites!
thanks!

 

[GoofyFan1]

I was just at WDW for the marathon and there is no dated Goofy, Donald or pluto plush. They only have Mickey and Minnie. My wife collects the plutos.

 

[harveyt0206]

Thanks for the update Steve.

The items shown are a bit too busy for my taste. I to wish they would introduce some more of the retro items that we have been seeing lately. Even so, I am sure one of these items will be coming home with me in March. :ROFLOL:

 

[muteki]

At least we won't be subjected to this type of merchandise each year for the next few decades:

 

[HMF]

At least we won't be subjected to this type of merchandise each year for the next few decades:

Those were popularized at the turn of the millennium and sadly lasted through the decade.

 

[EPCOT Explorer]

:lookaroun

 

[cdunbar]

:lookaroun

Geez EE way to shoot down our hopes of no ugly glasses this year...:lookaroun

 

[Mr.EPCOT]

Hey now, according to the National Association of Good Grammar, twenty-ten is correct.

http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-01-01/news/17466340_1_youtube-videos-grammar-twenty-ten

Let's not tempt the National Association of Good Grammar to lay the smack down. :lookaroun

Yeah, I was always much better at numbers than words. :lol:

Like westcoaster.net says, I put the sexy in dyslexia.

 

[WDW1974]

To the poster who was looking for 2009 logo stuff, my strong advice would be to phone the WDW outlet stores as Disney has warehouses full of that stuff and it will be making its way to the stores.

I never cared for date specific items ... although I did buy a 2008 DL cap as an emergency fill-in back in September! -- because I don't want to 'date' myself unless it's an opening or something of such significance. Since I haven't missed a year at WDW since 1973, I think I'd be in trouble if I had started buying items with years on them!

 

[fosse76]

It's annoying how they push it as twenty-ten. Two thousand-ten just sounds so much cooler (and numerically correct).

So would we be correct in assuming that in 1999 you would say "one thousand, nine hundred, ninety-nine?"

 

[Mr.EPCOT]

So would we be correct in assuming that in 1999 you would say "one thousand, nine hundred, ninety-nine?"

No, I suppose not. :zipit:

 

[Pumbas Nakasak]

Hey now, according to the National Association of Good Grammar, twenty-ten is correct.

http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-01-01/news/17466340_1_youtube-videos-grammar-twenty-ten

Let's not tempt the National Association of Good Grammar to lay the smack down. :lookaroun

As I said in another thread.

Bloody colonials