DDLand
Well-Known Member
Amen.Man, I really do like when you post. Especially posts like these.
Amen.Man, I really do like when you post. Especially posts like these.
Wasnt the original purpose of EPCOT a permanent worlds fair? This in hand tha nations remain as they are but future world can change when ever it is deemed it needs to be changed. Technology changes every day. Its not meant to last for ever. For one i actually can agree on one thing, for the price that toursist are paying for food, the quality should be better regardless of which park you are in. EPCOT had great food up until about 2008-2010 when a wave of new chefs and budget cuts were implemented on food. Somedays you might get lucky and get a decent meal but lets face it the quality is gone. I remeber a favorite of mine was the little restaurant in Japan. I used to order the Curry and used to get a lot of meat with it. Now if i get one chunk i get very lucky. Thr same goes for mexico and italy, and even the french pastry shop. I think the American pallet can stop being so naïve and realize that the food quality at EPCOT and the rest of the world kind of sucks. At least one thing that hasnt changed is the liquor and alcohol, disney can't control the distilleries and breweries. But as ive read i agree with most of you change is needed but baby steps first. The damage has been done and cant be fixed but hopefully wheb the newer generaition comes to power at the Walt Disney Co., things will change for the better because we carr and are detail oriented.
I think these are the restaurants at Epcot owned by non-Disney companies:To be fair, not all of the restaurants in the World Showcase are owned by Disney. I believe Japan, France, Mexico and Italy are all owned by outside companies. Not that it excuses quality issues (I can't comment as I haven't eaten at any of those recently) but it bears mentioning.
Epcots previous philosophy of a worlds fair is a dead one anyway. There is no need for a worlds fair because we have YouTube. 2015 is very different than 1982- obvious, I know. The world is an incredible atmosphere- and with some minor tweaks could be spectacular- namely every pavilion having 1) a table service 2) a quick service 3) an attraction- and adding an additional couple pavilions and that place is A+.
The fundamental flaw with epcot IMO is future world. Even all the hindsight love of horizons, or wonders of life etc- once you strip out the nastalgia, it is just so boring for today's masses. Sum of all thrills is great, but outside of that- does innoventions offer a thing that YouTube can't? With YouTube I get the absolute latest and greatest everything and displayed in a more attractive way.
I'd say if Disney doesn't think of a way to reinvent future world, it's going to suck. But, well, that ship has sailed. Really, the whole premise just needs to change. outside of the land, test track, and mission space- I'd want them to reinvent everything else (including you imaginations).
The attraction could be refurbed, but it isn't bad as is. But I do think that they need to expand the offering into a full blown "Space Pavilion". I believe that was the original plan when they were going to M:S.
So Expo 2015 is just a big lie?Epcots previous philosophy of a worlds fair is a dead one anyway. There is no need for a worlds fair because we have YouTube. 2015 is very different than 1982- obvious, I know.
And wonders of life- and a show about the birds and the bees- yes- that's unnecessary and completely out of touch with today's theme park attender. As I said before- take out the nostalgia and its Boring with a capital B. The one pavilion that gets it right is the Land. Great slow ride that is educational and nostalgic, an E-Ticket, and a relevant show (which could be updated). Please point me to another pavilion that- if taken back to it's prime- would have that type of appeal.
Youve been in innoventions, yes? That "display booth" layout is absolutely terrible and not relevant anymore. It needs to be redrawn/reimagined from scratch. The only "exhibit" worth a damn is actually a simulator/ride... because of well... the design/ride aspect.
And wonders of life- and a show about the birds and the bees- yes- that's unnecessary and completely out of touch with today's theme park attender. As I said before- take out the nostalgia and its Boring with a capital B. The one pavilion that gets it right is the Land. Great slow ride that is educational and nostalgic, an E-Ticket, and a relevant show (which could be updated). Please point me to another pavilion that- if taken back to it's prime- would have that type of appeal.
This forum is the twilight zone- I swear. When Disney doesn't change things, people complain they need to change things. When Disney makes changes- the complaints are to go back to how it used to be.
I'm stating the obvious here (obviously), but Epcot will sadly never be what Walt wanted it to be. So what SHOULD it be? Well, I think that World Showcase is pretty darn wonderful pretty much as it is. I always have a great time there. But I think that each country should have its own dark ride (like Maelstrom...I know I know...dead horse) or, at least, something more than just a gift shop and restaurant,
Interactive would be a problem. Each cabin (on each of the two fugues that actually spin anymore) move in sync with each other. And they have to.I think they need to update the films, make them random like star tours, and actually interactive.
The best they could offer is two different experiences--one for each centrifuge. Not that Disney has any impetus to do so. I'd be happy with one program with vastly improved graphics. It looks like Nintendo64 in there! I feel like it is an inherent problem with going with a CG ride--it does not age well at all. Comparatively speaking, it's not an old ride. Yet it feels ancient to me. It is also a pity to me that they can't do more with the post show. There is so much more that they could do with the space theme. instead we get a lame video game and a Discovery Zone.Interactive would be a problem. Each cabin (on each of the two fugues that actually spin anymore) move in sync with each other. And they have to.
Any random "change of course" generated by a rider would need a simulated cabin movement. Which it can't do.
Quite simply, the work of today is almost never in the same league as the originals, but it's also not the same company as back then. With a few notable exceptions where budgets are blown and creative folks are led by a fearless leader who goes to bat again and again - Indiana Jones, Tower of Terror, RSR - it's just an uphill battle to get an attraction at the level of the classics within the organizational structure of the company as it stands/stood within the past few decades. Unless there's a will from the upper levels to get something done, in which case, it gets done.I really, really hope you're right... in my view the half-hearted and obvious work of the Imagineering of today doesn't deserve to be in the same breath as the incarnation of Imagineering that made Pirates, Splash or Mansion, or the guys who did Wizarding World for Universal.
It's amazing how badly Mission Space has aged. Not something that was foreseen at all by any of the people I've worked with.The best they could offer is two different experiences--one for each centrifuge. Not that Disney has any impetus to do so. I'd be happy with one program with vastly improved graphics. It looks like Nintendo64 in there! I feel like it is an inherent problem with going with a CG ride--it does not age well at all. Comparatively speaking, it's not an old ride. Yet it feels ancient to me.
Is there any easy solution to this? I'm not sure that having a randomized experience here fixes the attraction.It's amazing how badly Mission Space has aged. Not something that was foreseen at all by any of the people I've worked with.
Right on.
I've said it a dozen times- I've been in the camp that each country should have:
1 Table service
1 quick service
1 attraction
Why they don't is beyond me.
My dream would be a Switzerland pavilion where the Africa area is now with the Matterhorn coaster there and the Fiji coaster in Japan. Two giant mountains flanking The back of the world pavilion. Tell me that wouldn't be a sight to behold.
Is there any easy solution to this? I'm not sure that having a randomized experience here fixes the attraction.
Quite simply, the work of today is almost never in the same league as the originals, but it's also not the same company as back then. With a few notable exceptions where budgets are blown and creative folks are led by a fearless leader who goes to bat again and again - Indiana Jones, Tower of Terror, RSR - it's just an uphill battle to get an attraction at the level of the classics within the organizational structure of the company as it stands/stood within the past few decades. Unless there's a will from the upper levels to get something done, in which case, it gets done.
Regarding the guys who did Wizarding World...many of those people also have worked for WDI. And many of the people at WDI have worked for Universal Creative. Same people, different day, different company. It's easily possible to get the same levels of work at both companies, it just depends on time, budgets, will from above and who's available.
So is everyone on the consensus that the mystery project a replacement for Illuminations though Jerry has never done a firework show that I'm aware of?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.