Judging by my PFP... I think I wouldn't outright turn my nose at Simpsons in DHS, I wanna see how they'd approach it largely?
I'm not crazy how Universal handled it, I hope if Disney does it it's more using the setting of Springfield versus the way Uni did it with it more being a 'theme park in a theme park'. I'm not opposed to seeing Disney do Simpsons, it's just hard to visualize it right now?
I DO think Moe's in Springs would be an excellent testing ground to see reception to Simps in Disney Parks.
@Blobbles said it best, it has the workings of what Disney WOULD want to put it in the parks, the only thing drawing me away from saying it's an inevitability is it being a more 'mature' IP than what WDW usually gets... IS WHAT I WOULD SAY IF WE DIDN'T HAVE A WHOLE LAND FOR AVATAR!
Avatar has freaky tail-tree stuff, lots of on-screen blood, violence, not very 'Disney' and in more ways more extreme than what Simpsons has! Simpsons is much easier to soften it's edges for the theme park setting than people here would say, if you want an IP Disney would likely avoid it's Family Guy, everyone thinks of Family Guy here when they think of Simpsons. We currently have Star Wars and Avatar in WDW along with GOTG. Is there anything in Avatar/GOTG that's more extreme than Simpsons? Even the language in those two is more extreme than Simpsons.
The Simpsons is ingrained into the pop-culture of America, everyone knows Homer, everyone hates Flanders, it's an IP that can be put into WDW and wouldn't have any sort of 'maturity' barrier to prevent it because it can easily be toned down. And by god, if Disney decided it HAD to go to WDW, wouldn't DHS appreciate something like a Simpsons land? A place that can offer more food options, more rides, and overall benefit the park more than hurt it while 'containing' the IP away from the other three parks?
Heck, if Disney wanted to rename DHS, using the 20th Century name isn't a bad shout either!