• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

DHS Monster Inc Land Coming to Disney's Hollywood Studios

osian

Well-Known Member
They have stated that they're moving away from "functioning studio" to "stepping into worlds from film".
I think that can be taken several ways and it's open to interpretation. No, it's not a functioning studio, as in a place where movies are made. So that doesn't preclude having a Pixar-themed area, Marvel-themed area, Lucasfilm-themed area, Disney-themed area etc, because the movies aren't made there. And "stepping into worlds from film" - this is exactly what they're doing to all the parks, the "Studios" bit doesn't make Hollywood Studios THE place to step into the worlds from film any more. I guess the ship has indeed sailed, we can argue all we want about themetic integrity, but if what Disney wants is for all parks to be stepping into the world of their movies with no other organisation than that then that is what they will do. Organisational mess and a copy of Universal is what we get.
 

andre85

Well-Known Member
I have less of an issue Monstropolis not being next to TSL and more of an issue it not being part of the outer loop they started with SWGL and TSL, instead it'll be a dead end even worse than Muppets Courtyard is today

Hopefully whatever ends up going in Animation completes the loop

Agreed. Especially since the park now has at least two dead-ends counting Sunset Blvd. I don't hate it in the latter's case, but now with two, this could get annoying. But then again, Universal's about to open a park with 4 deadends (and possibly 6 eventually lol)
 

Tony the Tigger

Well-Known Member
Not in the way suggested, no. Just because the same studio made two things doesn't mean that they "make sense" next to each other. What does Monstropolis have to do with Andy's backyard? Nothing. Putting them next to each other only means something if you have external knowledge of who made Monsters Inc. and who made Toy Story. Should Cars Road Rally and Space Ranger Spin go directly next to each other in Magic Kingdom for the same reason despite their wildly different theming?
Neither do the various princess, heroes, or villains groupings have anything to do with each other. 🤷🏻‍♂️
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
Neither do the various princess, heroes, or villains groupings have anything to do with each other. 🤷🏻‍♂️
I don't understand your point as it relates to the original statement that was made. Another poster suggested that two discrete lands (Monstropolis and Toy Story Land) "would make more sense" if situated next to each other because both were created by Pixar. But themed lands are not arranged by studio; that is entirely inconsequential to the experience of the parks. Yes, things that are vaguely superficially similar get grouped together within lands (as in your example of pseudo-European princesses congregating in medieval-styled Fantasyland), but the lands themselves, even when 100% IP-based, have never been physically arranged such that they fit into some weird corporate notion of who owns what property. If there is a logic to their positioning, it tends to focus more on which lands can transition into one another most easily when adjacent, but no such visual similarity exists between Monstropolis and Andy's backyard.
 

Timothy_Q

Well-Known Member
I think everyone is just arguing over semantics at this point

Is there any thematic link between Monstropolis and Andy's backyward? No

Would the transitions feel more organic if colorful lands based on animated properties were on one side of the park, and Galaxy's Edge, Star Tours and Indiana Jones were on the other? Yes
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
Would the transitions feel more organic if colorful lands based on animated properties were on one side of the park, and Galaxy's Edge, Star Tours and Indiana Jones were on the other? Yes
Monstropolis is, by design, a fairly standard cityscape that is not especially colorful, both in the film and the proposed land. The featured central building will be a factory. If you actually want visual cohesion between Toy Story Land and whatever goes next to it, there are better properties (and non-Pixar ones at that) to put in Animation Courtyard. Also, I am unconvinced that a park split in two between cartoons and not-cartoons is an especially good idea.
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
Traditionally - all cartoons were part of Fantasyland - one land of the park.

Sort of -- Pecos Bill is a cartoon and has been in Frontierland since opening day of the Magic Kingdom, although that's admittedly just the name and not something themed directly to the cartoon.

There have also been cartoons in Tomorrowland for almost thirty years now.
 
Last edited:

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom