lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
No, it is not. This is just a rationalization that keeps getting repeated.We also discuss this a lot on here, but replacing a poorly performing attraction with something more popular is a capacity addition
No, it is not. This is just a rationalization that keeps getting repeated.We also discuss this a lot on here, but replacing a poorly performing attraction with something more popular is a capacity addition
Why is he so wishy washy on Splash?I literally work with the guy and know him personally now, and I can tell you this is false. He will be negative if he wants to. It's okay if you don't like the guy, I'm not saying you have to, but assuming he is always positive is false.
What do you mean by wishy washy? He liked the original ride but also likes the new one. He was very vocal with his "let them cook" attitude. His opinion never changed much past the initial announcement, aside from feeling it didn't fit in Frontierland, which iirc he still feels that way but isn't as bothered by it.Why is he so wishy washy on Splash?
The cool kids know Aerosmith.No kids know who Aerosmith is either. This is essentially a lateral move to something with more relevance to ppl on a Disney Vacation and a better merchandising opportunity.
It's a cheap retheme for probably a fairly big boost to interest in the ride. It makes sense on paper. It's just not a bombastic expensive retheme. It's kinda refreshing to see them do this
Mick Jagger, right?The cool kids know Aerosmith.
Putting aside the reasons I think you’re wrong from a purely business perspective… I absolutely do not care if an area of the park maximizes guest spending or in any other way fattens Disneys wallet. Frankly, it’s a weird and possibly unhealthy way for a fan - a consumer - to think.MuppetVision is busy because the park is underdeveloped, but that's not an excuse to keep it. This land will be better utilized, attended, and more guest spending will occur. For a business, which its sole purpose is to make money... it makes sense.
The question becomes what do they do with AC.
Tom loved the attraction that shall not be named and admits Tiana is not as good, but he is very much in favor with the social justice reasons why it was erased from existence.Why is he so wishy washy on Splash?
Is that why MV3D was 2/3 full on a random day in September, which is typically a slow month? It must only be unused during the busy times, then.Monstropolis will be a net-positive, the Door-Coaster is a brand new attraction, and seems to be expanding the park berm. We also discuss this a lot on here, but replacing a poorly performing attraction with something more popular is a capacity addition, as the capacity at MV3D is mostly going unused.
Please no.They could do a Muppets Hollywood Tower of Terror movie/overlay too. Get rid of Twilight Zone finally. Gonzo and Rizzo are the bellhops.
The man who shall not be named from the site that shall not be named loved the ride that shall not be named based on the movie that shall not be named!Tom loved the attraction that shall not be named and admits Tiana is not as good, but he is very much in favor with the social justice reasons why it was erased from existence.
Exactly why it shouldn't be done.To me, Muppets ToT is seamless. The characters can fit right in. Just redo the film to have muppets instead of people. It would also be less scary (not that it is), and more family friendly. Gonzo and Rizzo do the pre-show, Miss Piggy and others are the guests who are zapped.
Putting aside the reasons I think you’re wrong from a purely business perspective… I absolutely do not care if an area of the park maximizes guest spending or in any other way fattens Disneys wallet. Frankly, it’s a weird and possibly unhealthy way for a fan - a consumer - to think.
Oof which is exactly why something probably is going to happen to TOT. I will be sooooo sad. But it is about to be the only attraction without a Disney IP attached in the park.Exactly why it shouldn't be done.
What do you mean by "get rid of Twilight Zone finally"? I hope the theme always stays. Hollywood Tower of Terror in Hollywood Studios. I mean, come on! Look, I loved my cruise on the Fantasy last year but maybe you should stick to Disney cruises.They could do a Muppets Hollywood Tower of Terror movie/overlay too. Get rid of Twilight Zone finally. Gonzo and Rizzo are the bellhops.
Rock kids.Mick Jagger, right?
MuppetVision is busy because the park is underdeveloped, but that's not an excuse to keep it. This land will be better utilized, attended, and more guest spending will occur. For a business, which its sole purpose is to make money... it makes sense.
The question becomes what do they do with AC.
Maybe Iger will put a hold on everything for 4 years starting Jan 20, 2025 and blame it on orangemanbadA new CEO takes control in 2026. Economic policy changes beginning in 2025 are going to cause the cost of construction to skyrocket and may crater the economy as a whole. Nothing that is slated to begin construction after 2025 should be considered close to certain - no Villains Land, no phase 2s, no Muppets Coaster, nothing.
Remember what the pandemic did to the Epcot redo in particular and the last wave of significant investments into the parks in general? The current situation is even worse, because the disruption is forseeable.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.