brich said:
Wow, Google is a wonderful thing... :lol: So you propose tunnels? And you feel your examples prove your right-o-ringo? Well I suppose if your going to finance such a venture, I'll give it try. Hey we can put a man on the moon then we can do just about anything. Of course your only arguing that the tunnels are possible. As far as practical or economical, then you might not be right-o-rama. Being right-a-roni is what your shooting for here right?
Dunno what Google has to do with it. I've always been an AltaVista man, myself. My knowledge of lower Manhattan being landfill comes from having seen old maps and drawings when visiting the New-York Historical Society as a wee lad. The bit about the Dutch artifacts I saw on a Discovery Channel show. I've been fascinated by the WTC since I first remember seeing its lights at night from the back porch of my grandparents' house. The bit with the buildings and tunnels I can talk about 'cause I spent a fair chunk of my life in them and among them.
What any of that has to do with being right-a-ring-a-ding-ding, I dunno. Hurfurfur.
As for proposing tunnels, I've done no such thing. Look a ways upthread, and you'll see that I made the fiduciary insanity argument against monorail expansion. I've spoken as to the unlikeliness of any kind fixed-guideway transit, from the financial and other standpoints, before, both here and elsewhere. I'll even toss one more negative in here: buses, bus drivers, diesel mechanics are all commodities. Monorails, monorail pilots, and monorail mechanics are all hyper-specialties. One can procure the former on short notice from places all over the country, and a national secondary market exists for same. The latter must be developed, at great cost, in-house, and have no intrinsic value outside of WDW. I'd be willing to bet, were the monorails not so visible and held in such affection by guests, that WDW management would love to ditch them and their poisonous costs in favor of buses and boats only.
So, can you give me those examples of subway systems is florida again? After all, it can be done so obviously they would have done it already right?
Take a deep breath. I was responding to the seemingly ironclad assertions above that subways would be impossible because the high water table would flood them. Even then, I was refuting the idea that they would flood, not putting forth the idea that they'd be easy or cheap to construct, nor even that they were a good idea in this case. Going underground is always difficult and expensive. It's done when the cost or economic disruption of working on the surface outweighs the additional cost of subterranean work. There's not too many places in the world where that's the case; maybe New York, London, and Hong Kong. Not Florida, and not anywhere near Orlando, for sure. I think you know all that, though.
I've lived in Florida for over 20 years, and I've heard way too many people say, with stentorian certainty, that one cannot build anything underground in Florida because it will flood. This is despite the fact that my first job out of college (in Florida, natch) involved descending, on a monthly basis, into a basement storage area whose floor was 6 feet below sea level, and about three blocks from a river. While it was a little damp, I never had to swim through it.
I've done more than enough to make this thread beyond tedious. It's well past the time for gin. If anyone eschews a WDW vacation because it relies on bus transit, he or she can always go to Hong Kong Disneyland, which has absolutely
Top Ho and Spiffing© connections to rail transit.