speck76
Well-Known Member
AEfx said:I am all for parents taking responsibility and checking out things before their kid does, that is just common sense.
What I don't understand is how that would have changed anything here - how is a layman parent to know at what level the motion becomes harmful? Do these parents have acces to electronic devices that measure G-forces? Do they also have degress in Engineering AND pediatric physiology to be able to make that distinction as to what is and is not appropriate physiologically for their child in a medical sense?
"Yes, after experiencing that attraction I feel as if my child has a chance of having a Brain Anyerism/heart failure/other unexpected medical issue that will cause death even though they meet the height requirement."
I just don't see it...unless there was knowledge of a pre-existing medical condition, there should be a reasonable expectation that it doesn't foster danger to a healthy person.
We have no idea what happened here. Blaming ANYONE is wrong, at least until we know medically what actually happened. M:S isn't a terribly intense ride to someone without motion sickness - roller coasters have higher G-force ratings. But, if you are sensitive to spinning, as I am - you get nauseus. If their child didn't have a diagnosed medical problem, even begining to second guess the parents at this point is in very, very poor taste - regardless of your opinion.
AEfx
OH MY GOD
I agree with you
(does that make you feel dirty?)
Disney could hand out a pamphlet to every person that gets in line that would state every G-force and sensation that they will feel, and every medical condition (known or unknown) that the sensations could complicate (they could model the pamphlet after the Shark Fin Soup pamphlet being used at HKDL) but would anyone read or comprehend it?
Also, many of the conditions aggrivated are unknown to the people that are so tragically taken from us on these rides. :lookaroun So would they even know if they are at risk?