Villains0501
Well-Known Member
Yes it was..And again, it could have worked if they had adhered to the 1939 film character look and style...and made it a little less green screen-y... There was just a little too much digital... made it like watching a video game...it could have really worked... so close.
If I’m remembering correctly, Disney did try to make the James Franco Oz film adhere more to the aesthetics of the 1939 classic than the Return to Oz did. I remember reading about a dispute between Disney and Warner Bros. (which owns the rights to the MGM library) over the pigment of the witch’s green skin, which had to be a different shade than the Margaret Hamilton Wicked Witch.
Which is one the greatest musicals ever
Wicked’s great and all, but I’d try watching some other musicals before making that judgement. I’d start with the Rodgers + Hammerstein catalog, then move on to the Sondheim shows. I find Stephen Schwartz’s work on Pippin and the Disney films to be much better than his work on Wicked.
It's a damn shame The Wizard of Oz has virtually NO representation in any major American theme park, despite the film's iconic status and continued appeal. Too bad most theme park companies focus on contemporary, likely flash-in-the-pan IPs instead (Avatar, Jaws, etc.). The film deserves better. And Oz would make an amazing attraction if done right. But then Disney doesn't care about its own Mary Poppins enough to give it a decent ride. What fools.
I agree with the general sentiment of this (though I wouldn’t call Jaws a flash-in-the-pan IP, I think it’s certainly earned its classic status). I’ve always felt classic films (both Disney and non-Disney) have been underutilized in the parks. I’m still waiting for my dream Sleeping Beauty dark ride, featuring a world-class Maleficent AA! Heck, they could repurpose the skin of the GMR Wicked Witch AA, if it’s still lying around!
Last edited: