Skip
Well-Known Member
This has always been true. Always. Whether people were denied access for monetary reasons like back in Walt's day, or denied access because of limitations that prevented them from waiting hours for a ride, someone always had to sit out.
The other major flaw in this thinking is that it assumes that the primary value of the visit is derived from only the new ride. It absolutely shows a biased toward repeat visitors that may only visit to see the new thing. It isn't reality in the slightest. People had fun at Disneyland the day before a new ride open and can still enjoy their day without riding the new thing.
Which is why ultimately, none of these virtual queue complaints amount to anything.
When you remove a guest's choice to wait (or not) from the equation, it absolutely has an overall affect on their experience, especially if they do care about the new ride (and I think we can safely presume many do).
These arguments are contrarian stretches that are incompatible with what is happening on a day-to-day basis. Whether you choose to accept that or continue to engage in mental gymnastics divorced from reality is up to you, but I am no longer interested in pretending the situation isn't what it is.