Originally posted by civileng68
If he's not convicted yet, then why shouldn't he be allowed in? First of all, do you know how many people come in those parks that are on trial for the same thing as he is? The only difference is that you know of him because he's famous. Trust me, there's much worse in the park that him. In fact, there's probably employees in the parks that you wouldnt want with your children, yet you let them take pictures in costumes with your kids.
He's not convicted and truthfully, you may not want to acknowledge it, but there's not even any evidence against him and personally if you saw what they did to his ranch you'd ralize this is a personal issue with the D.A. and Jackson more than an actual issue of Jackson doing something wrong.
They got a warrant to search the home, and instead they destroyed it and "supposedly" bugged the place. It's just not right.
Anyone can be accused of anything, just remember that when you think of how harshly you judge him. Your best friend can accuse you and sue you of molesting their children when all you did was hold them and kiss them. Just remember that.
If Jackson were "normal" looking he wouldn't be treated like this. However, if he's guilty he's guilty, period. I just think people are really crossing the line judging him based on his "weird" factor when there are so many "weird" people in the world and in fact, he's not been convicted of anything.
Again though, do you know how many CONVICTED and REGISTERED ______ offenders there are in the parks at any given time, yet you are wanting one who is ACCUSED with no hard evidence publicly known to be restricted from being at the parks?