Again, nothing but subjective absolutes. But everyone's entitled to their opinion.....
No doubt about it, it's my opinion. Everything I type is.
Again, nothing but subjective absolutes. But everyone's entitled to their opinion.....
Regardless of whether Jim Hill is a the village idiot or village savant, I hope this attraction goes forward.
That's funny. Jim Hill never criticizes the Disney company. I'm sure if I looked around here for 5 minutes I could find something about him being the most cynical Disney critic.
I'll take that bet. You have 5 minutes ... go!
He may criticize something they've done in the past (generally in a "if only upper management had given enough money" *shakes head* way), but he never criticizes something contemporaneously; or says that something they are planning is a bad idea. For example, you'd never hear him say the Fantasyland Expansion is a bad idea (unless it's 10 years from now and it sucks). Or that Cars Land is a bad idea, or that the additions to DCA are poorly conceived, or that the Space Mountain and SSE refurbs were poor, or that the Next Gen queues are a bad idea.*
And why should he or Al Lutz criticize additions and attractions still under construction?
I think everyone should feel comfortable praising that which they deem worthy of praise and critiquing that which they find criticism with - it applies to Jim Hill, Al Lutz, and everyone posting on this forum.
However ...
If all your information comes from "inside sources" at a company, and all you ever do is hype how everything that company does is great and wonderful and perfect, and you never ever point out things that company does that you disagree with, or critique them ... then that company better damn well have a perfect track record or I'm (and most other people are) going to consider you a shill for the company and someone who's information can't fully be trusted (outside of fulfilling the goals of the company).
In this instance, I think Jim's a shill for WDI and Walt Disney Pictures and I question the information he provides. When he tells me about this great Monsters Inc Coaster that has been designed and is wonderful and terrific, but it's not going to be built for awhile (if ever) - I ask myself, "Why does someone at WDI want me (and the online community) to think I'm missing out on something awesome?"
I think everyone should feel comfortable praising that which they deem worthy of praise and critiquing that which they find criticism with - it applies to Jim Hill, Al Lutz, and everyone posting on this forum.
However ...
If all your information comes from "inside sources" at a company, and all you ever do is hype how everything that company does is great and wonderful and perfect, and you never ever point out things that company does that you disagree with, or critique them ... then that company better damn well have a perfect track record or I'm (and most other people are) going to consider you a shill for the company and someone who's information can't fully be trusted (outside of fulfilling the goals of the company).
In this instance, I think Jim's a shill for WDI and Walt Disney Pictures and I question the information he provides. When he tells me about this great Monsters Inc Coaster that has been designed and is wonderful and terrific, but it's not going to be built for awhile (if ever) - I ask myself, "Why does someone at WDI want me (and the online community) to think I'm missing out on something awesome?"
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.