Perhaps I missed it.
Show me the post where a 2042 resort contract, purchased today, is a better value than a 2050+ resort contract purchased today.
I already have and you already claim to have refuted it because:
1. You don't believe in
discounted present value or
discounted utility.
2. You reject the use of proven econometric methods for evaluating the value of a stream of future benefits.
3. You ignored the market value approach as having any validity.
By rejecting anyone's methodological approach but your own and ridiculing everyone's else's assumptions in favor of your own, you have created an environment where comparison using different approaches is a waste of time. We have to agree to disagree. My methodology, which you reject, says that 2057 contracts are worth $25 more than 2042 contracts. The market says that 2057 contracts are worth $6-$9 more than 2042 contracts. You say that 2057 contracts are worth $40 more than 2042 contracts. In earlier posts you've rejected my analysis by saying that the concepts are beyond understanding and, thus, forfeit.
And somehow I've been lured into wasting another 15 minutes of my life posting another useless response that you will reject. And I don't think anyone the OP is reading this anymore because you've derailed the whole thread and made it a fight between you and everyone with an opinion that you don't agree with.
Edit: You've fooled me again. I said you've ignored the posts where I used numbers from actual resale contracts and then you ordered/challenged me to something else entirely. What a fool I was to have been taken in by your shenanigans!
Anyway, let me quote myself:
I think BWV is the one to look at. HHI and VBR are in a different class, as is SSR to a certain extent. BTW, where are you seeing $182 a point? I think Boardwalk direct is $171 a point after the January 2018 price increases, or $16 a point more than the contract above. For a 50 point contract that is $800 more but with $500 less in closing costs so a net $300 more. For the smallest 25-point addon, buying direct is actually $100 cheaper.
This analysis uses your actual quoted Boardwalk 50 point contract @ $155 a point with "50 points currently available and 50 points coming on 4/1/19. Priced at $155 per point."
I see BLT resale @ $160/pt. Direct price @ $191/pt
That's a $1,550 difference for 50 points.
I'll give you a $500 closing cost credit for a $1,050 difference.
I understand this is completely subjective, but $1,050 can be a substantial amount of money. It's roughly a 10-15% surcharge on the overall price.
I think I see those listings on one of the DVC resale sites. All the ones on the site I'm looking at are stripped and won't have points coming until 2019. This means that in the comparison against direct pricing you have to account for the value of the 2018 points that you'd get from buying direct. For that I like using the pricing of renting those points through a DVC point rental site. That's $17 a point. So on a 50 point contract that's $850, closing the difference to
$200. Note that the listing price doesn't equate to the price the seller will accept, so I could see this contract sitting for a bit.
Here I am using your example BLT resale. I see three contracts at one DVC resale broker, all with August use years and between $167-$169 a point, all stripped of current year's points. I admit I ignored the $7-$9 difference even though that would push the prices for these contracts $350-$450 more in favor of direct.
Of course, it may be that you don't think me using your exact example contracts as "using real-time pricing to justify my points".
This is why I think your rhetoric is just that.