mpoppins76
Well-Known Member
OMG DAVID WON!!!!
:sohappy::sohappy::sohappy::sohappy::sohappy:
:lookaroun
:sohappy::sohappy::sohappy::sohappy::sohappy:
:lookaroun
OMG DAVID WON!!!!
:sohappy::sohappy::sohappy::sohappy::sohappy:
:lookaroun
Ok heading to bed. Night!
... it sounds like I'm about to die.Don't worry Conner, it will be over soon enough.
Please take it for me.*crams for Connor's exam tomorrow*
________.
________.
________.
________.
________.
Please take it for me.
I'll provide payment in the form of fattening treats.
Gah.Not getting the math?
Yah.That answers my question.
Mixed with...? :lookarounConnor, I'd try chocolate milk.
:wave:
Mixed with...? :lookaroun
Does anyone know what to do when you reach a mental wall?
Is there some kind of steroid or illegal drug that would help? :lookaroun
BREATHE Connor.Mixed with...? :lookaroun
From who?I hear it goes good with Jose Cuervo.
Breathing is for mortals and lungfishes.BREATHE Connor.
I have some leftover medicine that knocks you out...
'kay, then don't breathe.Breathing is for mortals and lungfishes.
(EDIT: BTW, "fishes" is the preferred term according to our biology textbooks, while "fish" is the preferred English grammatical term. In this context, we'll go with the former.)
From who?
Connor said:(EDIT: BTW, "fishes" is the preferred term according to our biology textbooks, while "fish" is the preferred English grammatical term. In this context, we'll go with the former.)
Do you know anything about the Rainforest Action Network?From my imagination.
That's one way to look at it.Luke said:I think they're both right, technically. If referring to more than one KIND of fish, it would be fishes. But if referring to more than one of the same kind of fish or just a general large amount of fish, it would be fish. It's like "fish" correlates to "less" and "fishes" correlates to "fewer" grammatically.
:lookaroun
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.