GhostHost1000
Premium Member
and popcorn bucketsGive Disney credit. They have us buying fancy room keys.
and popcorn bucketsGive Disney credit. They have us buying fancy room keys.
Of course it's pointless! This whole enterprise is pointless! You pay $12 for a balloon, $7 for a box of popcorn, wait 90 minutes for a 90 second ride through a plastic mine filled with cartoon robots, and spend $60 for a crappy dinner where you get to hug four teenagers in furry costumes, but this.... THIS is the line in the sand. A step too far.But the ~$1 worth of components and lackluster features just make it all seem a bit pointless.
You don't "need to remember" to charge anything. Let it die, it'll still work.You get the priviledge of needing to remember to charge your band up, in exchange for 4 tiny blinking LEDs...very magical.
It's not a bad complaint at all - if you are purchasing it inside the park you shouldn't have to worry about it not being charged and then having to update it. All of which is time-consuming and just adds another minor level of stress to an already annoying theme park experience.
I'll probably do a bounty hunter mission or two at a time and "collect" the 50th anniversary statues. I'm not going to spend an entire day doing any of the interactive things, it will be at a leisurely pace.I haven't ordered because I cannot decide which I want. I just want a rechargeable band is all. Really don't care about the rest
I believe there was supposed to be one, but now they are in a weird place where they don't want to roll out a beta version of something for Starcruiser guests when their band needs to work 100% for 2 days.Any idea if there is going to be a Starcruiser-exclusive MB+? If you take an early shuttle from the ship to Batuu, you have time to play around, and playing the Bounty Hunter game would be a fun way to spend some time. It would be cool if there was a Starcruiser exclusive that would obviate the need to wear/bring separate MBs. Or maybe a handheld puck like on Mandalorian?
Yes, I'm part of the problem. Feel free to ridicule.
They could have designed the packaging so that the retail locations could access the ports to charge them. They could do it on a rolling basis throughout the day as they go through inventory.It's literally illegal to ship rechargeable batteries fully charged. Disney cannot, by law do what you'd like them to do.
Starcruiser does not have a MB+ yet. They are still giving the exclusive MB 2.0 to their guestsAny idea if there is going to be a Starcruiser-exclusive MB+? If you take an early shuttle from the ship to Batuu, you have time to play around, and playing the Bounty Hunter game would be a fun way to spend some time. It would be cool if there was a Starcruiser exclusive that would obviate the need to wear/bring separate MBs. Or maybe a handheld puck like on Mandalorian?
Yes, I'm part of the problem. Feel free to ridicule.
This is just impractical.They could have designed the packaging so that the retail locations could access the ports to charge them. They could do it on a rolling basis throughout the day as they go through inventory.
It seems like it should have been a no brainer for devices sold in a theme park, designed to be used in a theme park, by a company that claims to delight in giving their customers great experiences.
Yes that is basically what its going to take if you plan on using it during that first day. Ideally, people should buy ahead of time so it can be prepped.If buying a MB+ in the parks with the intention of using it right away, bring a portable charger.
I think the fact MB+ has bluetooth and works with your phone is the reason why it isn't part of MB2. MB+ needs the app for the "bounties".For the Bounty Hunters game and the statue interactions, is there technology in the band that limits those experiences to MB+, or could the long-range RFID in MB2 do the same thing and Disney is just locking them behind a paywall?
This is just impractical.
March 2021 for Apple Watch, but that is because Apple rolled out a solid product and developer framework for Disney to use. Android did not.
That doesn't really seem to be the case though. iPhone is waterproof and has a port.It's also not a "port." These come with chargers that are similar to what you get with a FitBit. If you could insert a plug into them then they wouldn't be water-resistant and people would rightfully be angry if their MB+ was ruined because they got soaked on Splash Mountain or Kali River Rapids.
That doesn't really seem to be the case though. iPhone is waterproof and has a port.
iPhones aren't waterproof.That doesn't really seem to be the case though. iPhone is waterproof and has a port.
Have we ever seen an IEC rating for a MagicBand? Would be interesting to see how it compares to something like an iPhone, which does pretty well at IP68 - 6 meters for 30 minutes.iPhones aren't waterproof.
You can drop one in a puddle but you can't take it swimming for an entire afternoon. They're rated for 30 minutes of submersion.
I might be wrong but wireless charging would involve more hardware and possibly licensing..It is interesting that it specifically says on shopDisney that magicband+ is waterproof rather than resistant, if the port is the weakest link to water resistance, they could gone the wireless charging route, I doubt wireless vs. external charging prices would have been much different. If it was wireless charging too they could add a wireless charger to the display case and keep them all charged during purchase.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.