News Magic Kingdom July 2020 reopening reports

TeriofTerror

Well-Known Member
Screenshot_20200708-083842_Twitter.jpg
 

Purduevian

Well-Known Member
So with Day 1 of cast member previews in the books, I have only seen a few major concerns from people.
1) The one off bunching up of people at 7D after rain opened it back up for the day. Simple solution would be to have the extended quene ready to go anytime the ride goes down.
2) Kilimanjaro mask optional. Few people are concerned with the actual idea of this, but more about people thinking it will make people think it is ok to not wear it on other rides.

Any other issues people saw?
 

lentesta

Premium Member
I was in the park for the entire day. My biggest takeaway was that we shouldn't forget sunscreen and umbrellas, and we should remember to drink lots of water. Oh, and hand lotion would be nice, because we're sanitizing our hands twice with every ride.

There's nothing new about using masks in the parks that we've all not grown accustomed to over the past few months. I saw 100% mask compliance all day. There were tons of CMs out to enforce it, too. The plexiglass partitions are novel, but I'll be used to them by Friday. The biggest hiccups in park ops were almost certainly due to it being everyone's first day back with actual crowds.

I tried 8 different styles of masks throughout the day, and found the large paper masks the most comfortable to wear, by a wide margin.

I really like the new mini-parades. You don't have to reserve a spot 30 minutes in advance for them, the performers seem to enjoy the undivided attention, and half the park isn't cut off from access while it's going on.

I think I like the socially distant character greetings a bit more. They seem to go faster and they're less awkward.
LenAndBuzz.jpg
 

Q_Division

Member
Here is a full report from yesterday

What it's like visit the Magic Kingdom with new COVID-19 health and safety restrictions

I know it hasn't been like it for a long time but I do remember the time when "off-peak" the fireworks at the Magic Kingdom were just on a Saturday.

The statement posed at the end of the article "It is clear that Disney cannot operate long term with such low attendance" is an interesting one. When I think back to my earlier trips going back the best part of 30 years which must be close in terms of numbers to the sort of attendance numbers we'll be seeing within a couple of months; then given it was viable then it must be close to being viable now. There is a reason Disney World (normally) operates 365 days while other parks have seasons of 150-200 days.
 

MrMichaelJames

Active Member
Those pictures are flat out depressing. I love the idea of low crowds but everything else is a definite no way, absolutely no way, never, will not do ever in the current format. Now it just looks like every other amusement park.
 

wdwmagic

Administrator
Moderator
Premium Member
Original Poster
I know it hasn't been like it for a long time but I do remember the time when "off-peak" the fireworks at the Magic Kingdom were just on a Saturday.

The statement posed at the end of the article "It is clear that Disney cannot operate long term with such low attendance" is an interesting one. When I think back to my earlier trips going back the best part of 30 years which must be close in terms of numbers to the sort of attendance numbers we'll be seeing within a couple of months; then given it was viable then it must be close to being viable now. There is a reason Disney World (normally) operates 365 days while other parks have seasons of 150-200 days.
I think there is quite a spectrum of what is considered viable. When you factor in Wall Street expectations, things shift drastically. Chapek has said they wont operate the parks at a loss, so we have to assume that they will be at least breaking even initially. But the desire will be to ramp up.
 

phillip9698

Well-Known Member
I know it hasn't been like it for a long time but I do remember the time when "off-peak" the fireworks at the Magic Kingdom were just on a Saturday.

The statement posed at the end of the article "It is clear that Disney cannot operate long term with such low attendance" is an interesting one. When I think back to my earlier trips going back the best part of 30 years which must be close in terms of numbers to the sort of attendance numbers we'll be seeing within a couple of months; then given it was viable then it must be close to being viable now. There is a reason Disney World (normally) operates 365 days while other parks have seasons of 150-200 days.

Being located in a semi-tropical environment 365 days a year is the primary reason.
 

Mainahman

Well-Known Member
I think there is quite a spectrum of what is considered viable. When you factor in Wall Street expectations, things shift drastically. Chapek has said they wont operate the parks at a loss, so we have to assume that they will be at least breaking even initially. But the desire will be to ramp up.
Makes sense. I looked at the other resorts opening, as a slow ramp up of capacity anyways.
 

Q_Division

Member
I think there is quite a spectrum of what is considered viable. When you factor in Wall Street expectations, things shift drastically. Chapek has said they wont operate the parks at a loss, so we have to assume that they will be at least breaking even initially. But the desire will be to ramp up.

That's true, there is a difference between viable and making the "expected" "large" profits and as such they will or course want to ramp up.

Being located in a semi-tropical environment 365 days a year is the primary reason.

That definitely helps make it viable but if they were loss making for 100-150 days year then they would be closed for such times.
 

_caleb

Well-Known Member
What’s the latest on the social distancing floor markings for queues/waiting areas? I know Disney went with the “don’t stand here” markings and Universal with the “stand here” approach. Have we seen any examples of how Disney is installing those in a WDW park?
I've asked elsewhere, but now that people have seen the parks from the inside, how are they handling the distancing markers on the ground? Most of what I've seen in photos are the "wait here" markers rather than the "leave this area open" approach. Using both seems like it might be confusing.
 

wdwmagic

Administrator
Moderator
Premium Member
Original Poster
I've asked elsewhere, but now that people have seen the parks from the inside, how are they handling the distancing markers on the ground? Most of what I've seen in photos are the "wait here" markers rather than the "leave this area open" approach. Using both seems like it might be confusing.
Seems to consistently be the wait here.
 

_caleb

Well-Known Member
Thanks. Seems like people naturally stand on the markers, so that seems like the better approach as long as it's applied consistently. The ones I've seen photographed in Disney Springs were the opposite, yet people were standing literally on the "don't stand here" symbol.
Disney-Springs-covid-19-reopening-3.jpg
 

wdwmagic

Administrator
Moderator
Premium Member
Original Poster
Thanks. Seems like people naturally stand on the markers, so that seems like the better approach as long as it's applied consistently. The ones I've seen photographed in Disney Springs were the opposite, yet people were standing literally on the "don't stand here" symbol.View attachment 482153
Yes that type of marker is not in use at the parks.
 

_caleb

Well-Known Member
It is a liquid in a portable hand powered sprayer. No details on what it is though.

A pic of the sprayer at Magic Carpets
Curious that they wouldn't mention what they're using. Seems like they would certainly need to disclose this info in CA if it's anything that might be considered "hazardous."

I imagine in the future ride vehicles will be designed to include an unloaded "drive-thru" disinfecting spray area. Depending on the properties of what they use, of course.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom