mousermerf
Account Suspended
To clarify, for anyone who's just now joining the program 
When Test Track first tried to open, it would have 4-5 hour long lines full of people Disney invited to come and see the attraction. They sent out fliers and such to passhlders and media much like they do nowadays. However, they didn't give themselves enough Test/Adjust time.
Commonly, with a 4-5 hour long line, filling the entire queue (before FastPass existed, so the ENTIRE building queue, the extended exterior queue, and then a line stretching back the Mousegear) it would just flat out die and refuse to move for hours.
Twas not a pretty sight. Disney actually brought the ride completely down, closed it up, worked on it for what - almost another year, or was it two? And then re-opened it again.
Invitations to Test Track's non-grand-opening are highly collectible items on ebay if you happen to have one.
Anyways - Jim is implying Everest will have thse kinds of issues. His little brain fails to acknowledge that Test Track is an entirely different beast than Everest.
Sure it will have some nice technical aspects etc - but existing coasters already have similiar. A coaster is 99% gravity and the occasional "if not clear then stop" safety brake station every so often to keep the trains for colliding in the event of a problem.
Test Track is 27 programmed vehicles excellerating and braking on command from 0-65mph on a track where they are 6-12 seconds apart. There is no "stop here if need be" brake station, but rather a command sent to a vehicle to shut it down if it needs to stop - a much more complicated process. That'd be a technical headache if you had just 2 vehicles, now remember it can run up to 27. Plus, the nature of the vehicle isn't just start and go, its accelerate, brake, report your speed, know your location, know the location of every other vehicle, and adjust for error (they dont always speed up or brake at the same speed in reality) in realtime.
Big scary complex math.
Everest? "Stop here" or "Green light means go" let gravity do the rest.

When Test Track first tried to open, it would have 4-5 hour long lines full of people Disney invited to come and see the attraction. They sent out fliers and such to passhlders and media much like they do nowadays. However, they didn't give themselves enough Test/Adjust time.
Commonly, with a 4-5 hour long line, filling the entire queue (before FastPass existed, so the ENTIRE building queue, the extended exterior queue, and then a line stretching back the Mousegear) it would just flat out die and refuse to move for hours.
Twas not a pretty sight. Disney actually brought the ride completely down, closed it up, worked on it for what - almost another year, or was it two? And then re-opened it again.
Invitations to Test Track's non-grand-opening are highly collectible items on ebay if you happen to have one.
Anyways - Jim is implying Everest will have thse kinds of issues. His little brain fails to acknowledge that Test Track is an entirely different beast than Everest.
Sure it will have some nice technical aspects etc - but existing coasters already have similiar. A coaster is 99% gravity and the occasional "if not clear then stop" safety brake station every so often to keep the trains for colliding in the event of a problem.
Test Track is 27 programmed vehicles excellerating and braking on command from 0-65mph on a track where they are 6-12 seconds apart. There is no "stop here if need be" brake station, but rather a command sent to a vehicle to shut it down if it needs to stop - a much more complicated process. That'd be a technical headache if you had just 2 vehicles, now remember it can run up to 27. Plus, the nature of the vehicle isn't just start and go, its accelerate, brake, report your speed, know your location, know the location of every other vehicle, and adjust for error (they dont always speed up or brake at the same speed in reality) in realtime.
Big scary complex math.
Everest? "Stop here" or "Green light means go" let gravity do the rest.