pdude81
Well-Known Member
Honest opinions please.........I know its been suggested..........But hear this out and let me know what the flaws are here for both guests and WDW the company.........
1) A return to paid FP+ system, priced where acceptance is at the same or a bit less as Genie+ (so 1/4 to 1/3 of people buy it that would have had FP+ for free prior)
2) Company gets their revenue (likely higher than Genie+ do to higher pricing)
3) planners get their benefits back
4) if priced at $100 pp, then sell "day of" FP+ for $25.........plenty of availability left since FP+ purchase rate is only 1/4 to 1/3 of original FP+ and company makes even more money and cost is much less so people dont feel taken advantage of
5) Standby lines should be shorter vs lower FP+ rates vs old system
Please no "Because the company wont admit they were wrong" answers because quite frankly, they already have admitted they were wrong.
Its a disaster and everyone knows it
Why wouldnt this work?
Flaws for guest - To price FP+ or G+ at an amount roughly equivalent number of people as crowds grow will at least double in price, and more likely be a large multiple. So it costs much more for lower or middle class families relative to the other massive price increases. At $100 pp that's unaffordable for most for more than one day. And if there were thunderstorms and you couldn't ride what you'd paid for on that one day you could afford it, you might get your money back, but still SOL on the ticket price and can't necessarily replace those rides on a different day.
Flaws for company - Optics on the rich being the only ones who could skip the lines are ugly. It's one thing to pay for VIP Tours which are out of the league of normal humans, but to tell people they can have the old free system back for nearly double their daily ticket rate would just cause different complaints from guests if they had long lines. Instead of complaining that the system sucks, they'd complain that the system was rigged and they'd never have a chance (IMO).
More clearly, the company wouldn't be able to remove inventory mid stream if a ride went down and wasn' tlikely to come back up. They'd be locked into the passes for those hours, which would suddenly just turn into ME passes that plug up other queses at random times. Right now they keep them locked into the ride you selected and can more easily predict when the ride comes back open how many outstanding passes exist.
I think your idea would work, but I don't think it's worth it for either entity. Plus the higher the cost, the more people expect out of a system. Someone earlier was suggesting a $300 unlimited pass which (as we've been through a few times) would start competing with the already successful VIP tour business.
They will definitely need to raise prices somewhat, but the mechanics for capping total puchases are unclear to me. Maybe you give priority for purchases of G+ to resort guests and let them buy the night before, and off site can buy at 7am. From there they really need to get more restaurants and all attractions open so that there is more capacity at the parks. Also a higher allocation to LL than current, even though that will slow down the standby lines a bit. I just don't think it's in the company's best interests to have us pay to lock in things ahead of time that they might have to refund. They can use the system to manage guest flow and ride backups if people aren't locked in ahead of time.