Just a thought on EE: cost effectiveness of animatronic vs real live castmember

nyfrenchy

Active Member
retroeric said:
Now, say they used a cast member instead.

OMG that would be soooo TACKY!
Lowering EE to a carnival ride, I dont think so!:mad:

Imagine the defunct King Kong ride at Universal Studio with a man in a gorilla suit instead of a AA...
 

pat_naughty05

New Member
nyfrenchy said:
OMG that would be soooo TACKY!
Lowering EE to a carnival ride, I dont think so!:mad:

Imagine the defunct King Kong ride at Universal Studio with a man in a gorilla suit instead of a AA...

Woah, are you implying that the Yeti is going to be as big as the Kong animatronic was? If so, wow! Something that big with the flexibility of the Mummy animatronic (or so is my understanding). That's hard to imagine. Well, that definitely rules out any possibility of putting an actor in.
 

WDWSwashbuckler

New Member
Number_6 said:
Apart from the suit of armor: http://www.doombuggies.com/myths4.htm

What else were there live actors for? The armor went away a long time ago.

From what I know, they weren't really "actors". Often the dark rotations were also backstage. If you look to the left when you see Litttle Leota near the end of the ride, you'll see holes in the wall. I suppose you could guess what these were once used for! :animwink:
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom