Jungle Cruise Update

Professortango1

Well-Known Member
Okay, seriously Hans, you throw dinner parties where you gather people of different races together to talk about race and "self-reflection"??? Like for real, you really do that, and you plan a menu and stock a bar and get the house all ready for that type of race talk?

As a party host, I can't think of anything more weird than talking about racism with mixed race friends at a dinner party. Or even if I hosted parties that only had white people, which rarely happens now except for immediate family.

Level with me please, you really host evenings and social events based on self-reflection and learning about racism???

Yes, my friends do speak about their experiences with discrimination. Maybe yours do not speak about it in your circles because they are aware that this would be the response.

With everything going on right now, having racial issues discussed isn't that bizarre of a concept. Its front and center with recent events.

I know our theatre group held a few open forums to review our policies and procedures to see where we might not appear welcoming to other communities in our city as well as discussing the kinds of stories they would like to see vs things we should avoid when trying to be inclusive.

And your list of Animatronics as an excuse to claim the natives were good representation for BIPOC people is a bit absurd. Context matters. You have mentioned you're homosexual. Would only adding homosexual characters to Toad's Hell scene work for you? How about a flamboyant lisping Mel Brooks-esque wardrobe character in Hollywoodland to act as a walking punchline to a director character? Having black people represented by literal spear chucking savages who collect the heads of the white explorers is a bit myopic.
 

Professortango1

Well-Known Member
There are human animatronics in Fantasyland. Animated humans still count like in Snow White with Evil Queen, 7 dwarfs. Gepetto and human Pinnochio in the end of ride. Tons of human characters in Mr Toad and Peter Pan. Peter Pan ride has some obvious minority characters. Jessica Rabbit in Roger Rabbit ride.

Galaxy’s Edge has Rey, Finn, Kylo throughout the attraction in multiple locations in Rise of Resistance.
Fun Fact; the ending Pinocchio figure is still a puppet.
 

britain

Well-Known Member
This might seem sort of off topic, but I don't think it really is:


It's a big piece with lots of different things in it, but a good portion is about the difficult minefield of trying to have genuine conversations about racism and sexism at Pixar, not just follow perfunctory scripts.
 

1HAPPYGHOSTHOST

Well-Known Member
You are again completely missing the overall point and message. But what you are doing is proving my other point, which is you don’t care enough to ask questions without the intention of coming back with a rebuttal to discredit my views on this topic surrounding my people.
I understand just fine what you are saying, I am just 100% disagreeing with your hypothesis. I am not trying to attack you, I like you. You are a great poster and fun and I really hope you fully recover from coivd and I am sorry that happened to you. It's just sometimes I think you are a little too sensitive about things and sometimes try to look for things to be offended by.
 

1HAPPYGHOSTHOST

Well-Known Member
Exactly. Notice the ones saying “it’s just a ride” are the ones that are upset. If it’s just a ride, then you shouldn’t care and give a bunch of energy into these changes.
Wrong. We are upset because 1. They are unnecessary. Changes just for changes sake especially for a ride that has been around since the 1950s that is beloved the world over. 2. We see the writing on the wall, first with SPLASH, then with SNOW WHITE, and now JUNGLE CRUISE that the classic attractions are not safe and Disney is going to make changes until the point the rides wont be what we fell in love with anymore. Eventually they will get to a change you do care about.
 

1HAPPYGHOSTHOST

Well-Known Member
I've never viewed the African Natives in the attraction as savages, just like no one views the Native Americans along the Rivers of America as savages. African Natives are a culture that exists, and African Natives defending their territory is also a thing that exists.

I've always viewed the ride as, well, a jungle expedition- and in this case the tribe is defending their native land... which every civilization ever has done.

I can understand saying that the depiction isn't accurate and is therefore insensitive- whether that be the character design, costumes, the chanting- but to say having African Natives included at all is racist doesn't make sense to me.

Perhaps removing the 'attack' segment, and modifying the 'dancing' portion to be more accurate both in character design, set design, and costuming- and rewriting the script to not joke about that bit in particular could be a way to have traditional African culture represented in a way that's tasteful- like the Native Americans along the Rivers of America.

And the more I think about it the more I like my African restaurant replacing Tropical Hideaway idea- since I'm not a huge fan of Tiki culture and it'd be a beautiful extension of the Jungle Cruise, which is heavily inspired by Africa.
THIS^^^ THANK YOU!
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
There are human animatronics in Fantasyland. Animated humans still count like in Snow White with Evil Queen, 7 dwarfs. Gepetto and human Pinnochio in the end of ride. Tons of human characters in Mr Toad and Peter Pan. Peter Pan ride has some obvious minority characters. Jessica Rabbit in Roger Rabbit ride.

Galaxy’s Edge has Rey, Finn, Kylo throughout the attraction in multiple locations in Rise of Resistance.

Yes, I even forgot all about Star Wars Land when I tallied Disneyland's human animatronics. But then we got into that really interesting discussion about racial prejudice and such a few minutes later, and I never went back to amend it.

I plan to update that list to include Star Wars Land, plus flesh out the Fantasyland dark rides more than just listing the specific country their original author was from.

I still think that's a really interesting tally to make; the number of human animatronics in Disneyland and their gender and race/ethnicity compared to the demographic makeup of the USA in the 21st century. Especially when some Disneyland fans feel that they are "given crumbs" by the Walt Disney Company due to a lack of racial representation in amusement park rides.

Stay tuned for an amended and updated list!

The same would go for an LGBTQ+ equivalent. If I were to attend a meeting, seminar, training, etc. regarding the LGBTQ+ community and the prejudices and issues they undoubtedly face in the workplace and outside the workplace, I as a straight woman have NO RIGHT to talk about my life as a straight woman (unless I’m acknowledging my privilege), whine and lie about how straight people have it hard too, dismiss the experiences of LGBTQ+ people, etc. I would be there to, yes, LISTEN and UNDERSTAND. The only time I would speak is when asking how I can continue being an ally and support the LGBTQ+ community and causes.

That seems like a boring conversation and training session. You sit there in silence while I drone on with HR approved talking points, and then at the end of the 2 hours you get to answer politely by asking some PC pre-approved question like "How can I continue being an ally and supportive of the LGBTQ+ Up With People Community?" Why the heck wouldn't you have a right to speak up? You are an employee there and just as equal as any other employee regardless of their race/ethnicity/religion/gender/sexual orientation, etc.

That type of workplace "discussion" just seems so stilted and fake and all rather meaningless. Like a bad Twitter feed.

I appreciate that you would want to be polite and respectful of a community you don't experience personally. But at some point, we just all need to stop being so darn scripted and fake about this stuff and just treat each other as adults and talk it out. A "Listening Session" sounds boring and mildly oppressive, like a more polite version of the Struggle Sessions the Communists did to political opponents during China's 1960's pogroms. An actual adult "Discussion" sounds much more productive to me. :)

As for my personal approach to race relations? I just try to follow the Golden Rule, and it's served me very, very well for decades. I can look back on a life well lived with pride and very fun memories because I (almost always :cool: ) followed the Golden Rule.

In your HR training sessions, do you ever just break it down to simple basics like that?... Treat others as you would want to be treated?
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
And your list of Animatronics as an excuse to claim the natives were good representation for BIPOC people is a bit absurd. Context matters.

Context does matter. But remember these are animatronics often seen only for a few seconds in passing boats or cars, and they don't have a chance to establish big dialogue.

I didn't claim the Jungle Cruise natives were a "good" representation of Africans, nor did I claim they were a "bad" representation of Africans. I merely claimed that they currently exist in a Disneyland E Ticket.

I think @raven24 actually had a valid point and an interesting angle on which cultures and what type of people are represented in rides at Disneyland. There's a bunch of stuff that just doesn't translate, like singing chickens or creepy aliens in a spaceport, but there are quite a few rides at Disneyland that have humans in realistic settings, and/or a story based on a specific nation's culture.

I plan to flesh out that tally of human representation at Disneyland rides more later tonight, over a Digestif while I enjoy the rain. I find it something really interesting we've never discussed here before! :)

You have mentioned you're homosexual. Would only adding homosexual characters to Toad's Hell scene work for you? How about a flamboyant lisping Mel Brooks-esque wardrobe character in Hollywoodland to act as a walking punchline to a director character?

Not only am I a Homosexual, but I am a practicing Homosexual! :cool:

Adding gays to the Hell scene on Toad would just be creepy, but also not related in any way to the source material from the book. But I get it, you are using an analogy of something Anita Bryant circa 1970 would approve of.

Adding a Dom Deluise character from Blazing Saddles to wander around Hollywoodland (with his assistant trailing him constantly with his bar cart) would be HYSTERICAL!

Context matters, as you say. And doing this in the right way would be wonderfully funny! Sounds like steam escaping!



Having black people represented by literal spear chucking savages who collect the heads of the white explorers is a bit myopic.

Not only that, they named a hotel bar after him! I really do wonder what happens to Traders Sam's at the Disneyland Hotel? Do they turn Trader Sam into a white man who is selling trinkets at the end of the ride so they can keep the name and the mystique, or do they just erase him entirely from existence and rename the bar Rosita's Hideaway?

That's something they will need to figure out, if Trader Sam does indeed disappear from history like a Russian General after a bad night at the Kremlin.
 

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
I understand just fine what you are saying, I am just 100% disagreeing with your hypothesis. I am not trying to attack you, I like you. You are a great poster and fun and I really hope you fully recover from coivd and I am sorry that happened to you. It's just sometimes I think you are a little too sensitive about things and sometimes try to look for things to be offended by.
You are disagreeing with my experiences, which doesn’t make sense. You don’t understand my post.

I’m not offended by anything. More proof that you actually don’t understand. Again, I’ve already made it very clear that I don’t care whether the animatronics stay or not. How and why some of you aren’t understanding that, I’m not sure.

And please don’t come to me about sensitivity when you constantly troll the boards about Disneyland being the almighty best, trying to pass your opinions off as facts.
 
Last edited:

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
Wrong. We are upset because 1. They are unnecessary. Changes just for changes sake especially for a ride that has been around since the 1950s that is beloved the world over. 2. We see the writing on the wall, first with SPLASH, then with SNOW WHITE, and now JUNGLE CRUISE that the classic attractions are not safe and Disney is going to make changes until the point the rides wont be what we fell in love with anymore. Eventually they will get to a change you do care about.
But it’s just a ride, so why are you putting so much energy into this thread and into trying to dismiss my experiences as a black woman? It’s not that big of a deal. We have bigger issues to worry about.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom