It is now. It didn't start that way.JC is about the scenes and campy humor and skippers, not the AA animals.
It is now. It didn't start that way.JC is about the scenes and campy humor and skippers, not the AA animals.
So, on Jim Hill and Len Testa's latest podcast, Jim said that there are plans in place to add new scenes to the Jungle Cruise featuring characters, etc. from the upcoming movie. This all depends, of course, on whether or not the film is a success, but he says that they have already done a lot of prep work, including using designs created for an abandoned update from the 1990's that would have tied in with George of the Jungle. This being from Hill, it's definitely in the "rumor" category, so take that for what it's worth.
Personally, I still hate the Pirates film characters being retrofitted into the ride as it never really fit and, in my opinion, took away from the original attraction's charm. I know that lots of folks here are of the opinion that JC needs something done to it, so this may be it. With Iger and Chapek's mandate that any new additions be IP-based, it would certainly fit with their modus operandi of late.
I'm going to go out on my porch and yell at kids for a while.
With all due respect, any "rumor" from Mr. Hill is taken by yours truly with a massive grain of SALT.
You must have wifi on your porch.There is a difference between additions that seamlessly blend with what came before to additions that, by their presence, impose their ideas upon the attraction and substantially change its tone. It would have been possible to have Captain Jack as one of the pirates and toss in a few nods to the films so that they would be visible, but not intrusive. That didn't happen. I also don't expect any kind of subtlety in any film-related changes to the JC. My problem isn't with additions, it's with additions that alter the tone of the original attraction.
My issue with the IP invasion of POTC, is the dominance of Jack Sparrow on the ride. Here and there I'd be on board. But Jack just seems to be everywhere, and having the repetitive character there seems to ruin the timeline for me of the somewhat loose story. Since Jungle Cruise has an ever looser story to it, I could see how this would be done really poorly. At the same time, I think it could be done well, if characters and scenes are interspersed, and we are just seeing them (rather than adding some sort of storyline to what we're seeing)
That just means they'll turn Jungle Cruise into a tie-in for the live-action Lion King or something instead.Anyone else boycotting the movie for precisely this reason?
My only problem with that is the jokes really need to pertain to something that the guest can see in the attraction, since not everyone will have seen the film. If they do end up adding in movie details, I'm sure they'll change the spiel. I would absolutely love to see JC get some TLC and have some of the AA figures updated. I'd even be okay with them making some additions to it. I just hope that, if they do add things from the film, that they don't completely take over.I wouldn't mind it. I would personally love to hear new jokes from the skippers based on those scenes.
Well the last few times I went on it they had already started with adding in jokes about The Rock and taking him for granite.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.