Journey of Water featuring Moana coming to Epcot

monothingie

Evil will always triumph, because good is dumb.
Premium Member
First picture from Bioreconstruct. I added all the areas in pink circles. Looks like they are preserving the Epcot tunnels and building access stairs/elevators to park level. The two new concrete structures at the north and south end appear to line up exactly with where the stairs are or used to be.
img_7985.jpg
qk3h7bd9fcc31.jpg
 

EeyoreFan#24

Well-Known Member
Question for the engineers here, did reusing the tunnels qualify as a renovation, remodeling, etc. of the structure for some of these projects. I guess they were actually the ground floor of the facility and still exists.
 

J4546

Well-Known Member
This implies guests have any control at all over what happens in the parks aside from being able to complain ex post facto. None of us are "settling" for a design we had no say in. Rather, we're all moving on in our own way. For some, moving on means acknowledging that the EPCOT they loved no longer exists and that they'd rather spend their time elsewhere. For others, moving on means that, even though they recognize the loss and the shift away from the original intention of the park, they're still interested in seeing what's next.
for some, we actually like the things that are happening at epcot and look forward to JoW
 

doctornick

Well-Known Member
I don't get why people are settling for some more landscaping. There was a literal warehouse you could stick a real Moana attraction in. I'd rather have that then some pathway with rocks and water.

I suspect though that WDI set out to design a pleasant landscaping and water feature leading to the Seas. That itself was the goal and they probably decided to do that then gave it a Moana theme (as per IP mandates). I think that someone looked at FW and felt it needed more outdoor natural lush features - we can argue whether that was a good conclusion but I can at least understand that motivation.

IOW I don’t think they set out to specifically build a Moana attraction and settled on this idea/location rather than a dark ride or roller coaster in Adventureland or whatever.
 
Last edited:

marni1971

Park History nut
Premium Member
Seems like they basically shifted that stuff to the WoL building for Play. Would that have been addition to Play (or instead with Play being used for something else or left empty)?
The Communicore re do wasn’t a kids playground. It was more for adults of all ages (and really just the north west corner had entertainment - the other 3 quads had ancillary functions like east is becoming.
 

ppete1975

Well-Known Member
Meet n greets, exhibition space and a new theatre. And some ancillary F&B

Slightly more than what we’re getting with a demolition and expensive rebuild after ripping out the middle of the park. Without thinking of the aesthetic, theming and balance issues. Nor money. We could have had a real repurposed and updated core plus a fixed Imagination.
Im curious as the Disney historian that you are. Now that every new land or experience has to have an area for a meet and greet, or if they are just too lazy to come up with anything new. What was the first meet and greet at disney world? As a kid the characters were just free roaming. What was the first true meet and greet location?
 

rioriz

Well-Known Member
I suspect though that WDI set out to design a pleasant landscaping and water feature leading to the Seas. That itself was the goal and they probably decided to do that then gave it a Moana theme (as per IP mandates). I think that someone looked at FW and felt it needed more outdoor natural lush features - we can argue whether that was a good conclusion but I can at least understand that motivation.

IOW I don’t think they set out to specifically build a Moana attraction and settled on this idea/location rather than a dark ride or roller coaster in Adventureland or whatever.
Just like they never intended to build a Rapunzel bathroom versus and attraction They needed more bathrooms and slap Rapunzel on it
 

Castle Cake Apologist

Well-Known Member
Im curious as the Disney historian that you are. Now that every new land or experience has to have an area for a meet and greet, or if they are just too lazy to come up with anything new. What was the first meet and greet at disney world? As a kid the characters were just free roaming. What was the first true meet and greet location?

I know you were asking Martin, but I believe meeting Mickey in Mickey's Birthdayland was the first major meet & greet. The success of that eventually led to where we are now.
 

pdude81

Well-Known Member
If that was the alternative, the decision to go with the Journey of Water and Festival Center/restaurant/bar makes more sense.

It seems like whatever team was pitching to keep the building was thinking rather small.
I rather enjoyed Colortopia, and really liked some of the other stuff that was there in decades prior. You had to put in some effort to go find where the exhibits were at times though. Bad signage and non-existent marketing. I really wish the concept for play pavilion was set up in these buildings and allow WoL to either be a filled by attractions or held for future use.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom