Figments Friend
Well-Known Member
I can say that your assumption is correct, at least in our case. DL is "our" park, since we live 90 minutes away. Last year, we spent part of our road trip at WDW and were absolutely *blown away* by its size. Once there, when we realized just how big it was, we understood that staying on property is absolutely essential. (We were at PopC.) As others have commented in other threads, though, the feeling of parallel universe hit us in two places: the MK and in AK. (Animal Kingdom because of its extreme similarities to "our own" San Diego Zoo and Wild Animal/Safari Park.) The transportation system is incredible. One thing I wished for DL is a monorail stop in DCA.
Donna
Yes, i agree regarding saying *On Property*.
When visiting DL, there is no real incentive to stay at one of their own official hotels. No real *benefits* like their are when you stay at a WDW Resort.
I was always puzzled by this until a friend set me right with a explaination - two completely different animals.
DL caters mostly to locals, WDW mostly to visitors from afar.
Thus the differences in *benefit offerings* between the two Parks Resort Hotels.
DL does not need to offer such *benefits* to it*s Guests.
WDW on the other hand, it is a must for many.
The transportation benefit alone makes it worth it.
One thing i still think DL should consider - having something like Disney*s Magical Express at LAX. THAT would rock.
This would entice people like me to pony up the extra cash to stay *On Property* at DL moreso then now.
With so many other non-Disney hotels so close to the front gates, there is no point to me to pay the premium in lodging....exspecially since there are no real *benefits*.
I like the differences. This is what makes traveling entertaining and enriching on a personal level.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0dd6/a0dd67a17ec8b6e6bcb45d7047f3d9bfe87084bb" alt="Smile :) :)"