Rumor Is the End of Innoventions Near?

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
Well, if it is foolish to have two attractions in the same building (Pandora) then this makes sense. The Land will have to go as well along with the concept of even doing proper old-school pavilions.
The Land's attractions do not share a building the way Pandora's attractions do. Their entry points are in the same building, but the attractions aren't. You could have a fire alarm go off in one without having to evacuate the other. Not so in Pandora.

Wonders of Life was the same way - you could enter either attraction from under the same roof, but in doing so you entered a different "building" that was part of the Wonders Complex.

The only Future World Pavilion I can think of where 2 separate attractions truly shared a building is the original Imagination -- but even then you could argue that the Imageworks was not really a separate attraction, but rather the post-show for the ride itself.

Flight Of Passage's queue is built over Na'vi River Journey - the 2nd story of the same building.
 

prberk

Well-Known Member
By the time they could build this the concepts would already be obsolete.
That’s where I disagree: the CONCEPTS were universal (imagination, the seas, life, energy) and timeless; it’s the execution that can be tricky. Done right, it can be more inspirational in nature (while still yet fun and/or informative) and kept up where necessary.

It just takes work and dedication and vision — something the company used to have and can still, especially if Epcot is understood to be the discovery park.
 

Cmdr_Crimson

Well-Known Member
That’s where I disagree: the CONCEPTS were universal (imagination, the seas, life, energy) and timeless; it’s the execution that can be tricky. Done right, it can be more inspirational in nature (while still yet fun and/or informative) and kept up where necessary.

It just takes work and dedication and vision — something the company used to have and can still, especially if Epcot is understood to be the discovery park.

Knowing their Mindset it would be like this...
2rwcvt.jpg
 

eliza61nyc

Well-Known Member
That’s where I disagree: the CONCEPTS were universal (imagination, the seas, life, energy) and timeless; it’s the execution that can be tricky. Done right, it can be more inspirational in nature (while still yet fun and/or informative) and kept up where necessary.

It just takes work and dedication and vision — something the company used to have and can still, especially if Epcot is understood to be the discovery park.

If that were true wouldn't the stuff they had in there originally still be relevant? seriously, If Epcot had this timelessness to it, where and when did it go wrong? We started going late 1990's, early 2000 and my kids thought and still think that Epcot was the dullest of the parks.
Now I admit, I must have strange kids because on vacation they wanted rides and they liked fresh stuff. Ellen's energy adventure always bored them so not sure we've every felt that Epcot was good at "edutainment". the living land?? one and done.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom