EricsBiscuit
Well-Known Member
Moana could fit in DAK. One of the messages I got from it was to not mess with nature and also don't underestimate its power. Definitely could work.
Last edited:
Jungle Book?This is news. There are two proposals that I think that modern Disney could try to make happen in AK, being the Adventureland and EPCOT projects.
Momma could fit in DAK. One of the messages I got from it was to not mess with nature and also don't underestimate its power. Definitely could work.
Having someone put you in a 55 gallon barrel and beat it with two-by-fours would be just as terrifying and surprising.I really like the set up to Dinosaur... you walk through a dinosaur museum, nothing very interesting, you go into a pre-show that seems quite corporate until things go a little... wrong... and then you get on the ride and (on your first ride) it is quite a terrifying surprise.
Darn auto correctMomma?
I guess to me Moana fits AK as much as A Bugs Life, Finding Nemo/Lion King, a Yeti, a time traveling ride, and a sci-fi fantasy about giant Indian smurfs. But really, I just want a immersive South Pacific Land where HeiHei gets to save the day...so I’m obviously biased.I'm mildly confused at people suggesting Moana for Animal Kingdom. The only way I could ever see that being reasonable is if they threw it back where rafiki's planet watch is. But Moana is a fantasy, musical, childrens property, despite its base in polynesian culture. I'd see it as a worse addition than Indiana Jones, tonally.
I’d say it wouldn’t be temporally appropriate since DAK takes place in the present day, but post conflict Pandora is centuries from now.Moana would NOT work at all in DAK. Tonally and thematically not appropriate.
Actually, if you think about it, ALL of Disney's creations are IP-based. The only difference between the new ones and the originals are that the new ones are focused on new IPs, rather than ones like Snow White, which is based on a story from the middle ages.Edutainment is soooo 1980s.
Today, it's all about including IPs to make it "relevant"!
Well, yeah, I suppose, if you say an IP is strictly an IP. I meant more a popular IP...like a character tie in.Actually, if you think about it, ALL of Disney's creations are IP-based. The only difference between the new ones and the originals are that the new ones are focused on new IPs, rather than ones like Snow White, which is based on a story from the middle ages.
Well, yeah, I suppose, if you say an IP is strictly an IP. I meant more a popular IP...like a character tie in.
But, World of Motion didn't initially include that sort of IP. Neither did The Land. Neither did the Living Seas. Or Horizons.
At least not a recognizable one...
They had their own unique stories to tell, and told them well (especially Living Seas and Horizons).
That...isn't what they do anymore.
Pandora takes place centuries in the future.I’d say it wouldn’t be temporally appropriate since DAK takes place in the present day, but post conflict Pandora is centuries from now.
Moana can work in DAK, but I don’t think the company wants to stomach another big budget Joe Rohde joint.
BTW, Tokyo DisneySea would be the park where she has the strongest thematic connection.
As we’ve seen with the SW:GE cuts, nothing is ever assured.
What cuts, did I miss something?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.