Originally posted by ISTCNavigator57
It's an issue of money. It doesn't make sense to run two expensive stunt shows if one is clearly more popular than the other (which the new show will certainly be--it is simply more high tech, more "testosterone driven"). As opposed to paying for more actors, it would make more sense to have one show, and put in a new attraction in place of the other. Case in point (I have heard stories about zoning issues w/ the theatre--somehow it was never meant to be permanent), we now only have Beauty and the Beast, not it and the Hunchback...paying to have two expensive stage shows daily does not make as much sense as adding new, different attractions to make a more diverse park. We don't want a park full of shows, and it's been awhile since a new ride has debuted at the Studios (4 years on my count)...time for a new ride, I think.