TestTrack99
Well-Known Member
I-4 is a danger zoneSpace Mountain is slightly safer than a drive on I-4.
I-4 is a danger zoneSpace Mountain is slightly safer than a drive on I-4.
The one in Anaheim closed very abruptly in April 2003 because the ride's structure was in shambles and was suggested that a major structural failure could occur soon.Does it have issues? Sure. All rides do. Is it unsafe? If it were, it wouldn't be open. That's definitely an area Disney doesn't play around with.
Yep the real question is how long of a life did the engineers expect out of it and are we at that time yet or not. All things wear out even steel structures wear out over time, though that could take an insane amount of time... I would expect that the one in DL may also have more stress put on it because of earthquakes that would occasionally put stresses on the structure that weren't expected.The one in Anaheim closed very abruptly in April 2003 because the ride's structure was in shambles and was suggested that a major structural failure could occur soon.
The one in Anaheim closed very abruptly in April 2003 because the ride's structure was in shambles and was suggested that a major structural failure could occur soon.
The structure at Disneyland failed due to additional weight of the on-board audio system.Yep the real question is how long of a life did the engineers expect out of it and are we at that time yet or not. All things wear out even steel structures wear out over time, though that could take an insane amount of time... I would expect that the one in DL may also have more stress put on it because of earthquakes that would occasionally put stresses on the structure that weren't expected.
That's not very assuring. I would have hoped that when it was designed that it would have had a bit more overbuild in the system that the added weight of some on-board audio system wouldn't have been the straw that broke the camel's back. I wonder if they also originally designed it based on the average size of people back in the 1960's and the super-sized average of today didn't add a little more stress to the system as well.The structure at Disneyland failed due to additional weight of the on-board audio system.
The audio system wasn’t exactly a Walkman. It was a big, bulky system.That's not very assuring. I would have hoped that when it was designed that it would have had a bit more overbuild in the system that the added weight of some on-board audio system wouldn't have been the straw that broke the camel's back. I wonder if they also originally designed it based on the average size of people back in the 1960's and the super-sized average of today didn't add a little more stress to the system as well.
That would explain it, as the track was built when the attraction didn't have music, so it was not built to withstand the added weight.The structure at Disneyland failed due to additional weight of the on-board audio system.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.